-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for RFC5780 #17
Comments
Hi, providing a list of servers that are fully compliant to the RFC5780 would be a significant task, as there are a lot of behaviours to test to ensure 100% compliance. However, a much more manageable task would be to test for servers that support enough of the RFC5780 spec to conduct a NAT behaviour test. I will look into this in the coming days/weeks. |
I wrote a simple script to filter out servers supporting RFC5780 from a list. |
Apologies for the wait here. I'll get this done today |
I added |
I randomly selected several servers, but none of them support nat behavior testing. 😿 |
Very interesting, let me investigate further! |
Stuntman or NatTypeTester |
stunserver.stunprotocol.org
supports NAT behavior test over udp/tcp, but can't find any other equivalent replacement on the internet. I guess it's a needle in a haystack.If possible, hope to provide a list of servers that support RFC5780. Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: