You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
julia>versioninfo()
Julia Version 1.12.0-DEV.348
Commit d8b9810b890 (2024-04-1600:07 UTC)
Build Info:
Official https://julialang.org/ release
Platform Info:
OS: macOS (arm64-apple-darwin22.4.0)
CPU:8× Apple M1 Pro
WORD_SIZE:64
LLVM: libLLVM-16.0.6 (ORCJIT, apple-m1)
Threads:6 default, 0 interactive, 6 GC (on 6 virtual cores)
the "Simple linear regression" test fails.
Test Summary:| Pass Fail Total Time
MixedModelsMakie.jl |6616728.9s
Aqua |775.9s
utilities, types and tables |241254.4s
utilities |550.0s
Simple linear regression |2131.2s
confint_table |442.7s
ranefinfo |13130.3s
[qq]caterpillar |10103.8s
clevelandaxes |110.9s
coefplot |440.4s
recipes |330.5s
ridgeplot |221.5s
ridge2d |442.1s
shrinkageplot |992.4s
splom! |220.7s
profile |06.2s
I assume this is because the data are generated using MersenneTwister(42) and that result may have changed between Julia versions. Should we use StableRNGs instead?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, please. I would also check that there isn't a change in floating point error from a LinearAlgebra tweak -- if there is, then we should adjust our tolerances accordingly as well.
Under
the "Simple linear regression" test fails.
I assume this is because the data are generated using
MersenneTwister(42)
and that result may have changed between Julia versions. Should we useStableRNGs
instead?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: