[SharingNG] Unified Roles are not sorted by weight

[micbar]

Describe the bug

Sharing roles are not sorted by weight in the dropdown.
The libregraph API provides a sorting by weight, which should be respected in the clients.

Steps to reproduce

1. Create Folder
2. Open Network tab
3. Click quick action "Share"
4. Select Sharee
5. Open Sharing Role Dropdown

Expected behavior

Items in the dropdown should be sorted by weight.

Actual behavior

Sorting is kind of random

Setup

Ocis 7.0.0-rc.2

Screenshot

[micbar]

@AlexAndBear @JammingBen I hope this is just a small fix.

Maybe we failed to communicate the expectation.

[AlexAndBear]

@micbar does the roleManagement/permissions/roleDefinitions does support any orderBy or sortBy query param? If no, can you make it happen ?

[micbar]

@micbar does the roleManagement/permissions/roleDefinitions does support any orderBy or sortBy query param? If no, can you make it happen ?

I do not understand that correctly. The individual permissions call on the resource has the weight property. What is missing there?

[AlexAndBear]

@micbar does the roleManagement/permissions/roleDefinitions does support any orderBy or sortBy query param? If no, can you make it happen ?

I do not understand that correctly. The individual permissions call on the resource has the weight property. What is missing there?

We fetch and persist the roles from the /roleDefinitions endpoint rather from the /permissions endpoint shown in your example, I was wondering if I can sort them via a query param on the endpoint rather than sorting in the client

[micbar]

We fetch and persist the roles from the /roleDefinitions endpoint rather from the /permissions endpoint shown in your example, I was wondering if I can sort them via a query param on the endpoint rather than sorting in the client

Hmm, so you are not context sensitive? IMHO we should respect the weight property from the permissions call

"@libre.graph.permissions.roles.allowedValues": [
        {
            "@libre.graph.weight": 1,
            "description": "Ansehen und herunterladen.",
            "displayName": "Kann anzeigen",
            "id": "a8d5fe5e-96e3-418d-825b-534dbdf22b99"
        },
        {
            "@libre.graph.weight": 2,
            "description": "Ansehen, herunterladen, hochladen, editieren, hinzufügen, löschen.",
            "displayName": "Kann bearbeiten ohne Historie",
            "id": "3284f2d5-0070-4ad8-ac40-c247f7c1fb27"
        },
        {
            "@libre.graph.weight": 3,
            "description": "Ansehen, herunterladen, hochladen, bearbeiten, hinzufügen, löschen - inklusive der Historie.",
            "displayName": "Kann bearbeiten",
            "id": "58c63c02-1d89-4572-916a-870abc5a1b7d"
        },
        {
            "@libre.graph.weight": 4,
            "description": "Ansehen, herunterladen, hochladen, bearbeiten, hinzufügen, löschen, teilen und Mitglieder verwalten.",
            "displayName": "Kann verwalten",
            "id": "312c0871-5ef7-4b3a-85b6-0e4074c64049"
        }
    ],

They are always sorted correctly for the current resource and have a weight property. The "/roleDefinitions" is called during bootstrap AFAICT and not called again, so it is not context aware.

[AlexAndBear]

I am fine, sorting will take place in frontend, pr is linked 👍