test(CL): multiple swaps over contiguous initialized ticks with tick spacing of 1

[p0mvn]

Background

This is a follow-up to:
#5526

We need to define tests that swap over adjacent contiguous initialized ticks with tick spacing of 1.

Suggested Design

General setup:

1. Initialized 3 positions at each tick spacing increment around the current tick

The layout should look like the following:

                                                                        original_cur_tick
                                                                           /////////
                                                                       ////////////////
                                                                   //////////////////////
min tick                                                                                             max tick

Zero for one

• swap to the middle tick to the left of the original current, then swap again to the leftmost tick
• swap to the middle tick to the left of the original current, then swap again to the rightmost tick smaller than the original current
• swap to the middle tick to the left of the original current and swap again but stay within the same initialized tick
• swap to the middle tick to the left of the original current and then swap all the way back to the original current tick
• swap beyond the leftmost tick and assert the error

One for zero

• swap to the middle tick to the right of the original current, then swap again to the rightmost tick
• swap to the middle tick to the right of the original current, then swap again to the leftmost tick greater than the original current
• swap to the middle tick to the right of the original current and swap again but stay within the same initialized tick
• swap to middle tick to the right of original current and swap again all the way back to the original current tick
• swap beyond rightmost tick and assert error

Acceptance Criteria

• test vectors added

[AlpinYukseloglu]

These test vectors should fit quite cleanly into the tests introduced in #5476 (would just need to implement the swap vectors as additional optional test parameters).

Up to you whether building deeper context on those tests is a good time tradeoff but wanted to voice the option

[p0mvn]

Thanks. YeahI've looked at #5476 and while some of the setup logic could be reused, it felt more intuitive to me to continue plugging these vectors into the hand-picked "swap tick cross test suite" I added here: #5526

It does feel like a worthwhile addition as we have no tests covering that currently. I also suspect it let me uncover another critical bug. Will update once confirmed