Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upstream Supply Offsets feature to the SDK #2089

Open
2 tasks
ValarDragon opened this issue Jul 15, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
2 tasks

Upstream Supply Offsets feature to the SDK #2089

ValarDragon opened this issue Jul 15, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@ValarDragon
Copy link
Member

Background

We should upstream our bank supply offsets feature to the mainline SDK. This will help keep the feature parity difference between our forks more in line.

Suggested Design

Cherry-pick / otherwise copy over changes to SDK. Need to understand if theres any acceptance criterion SDK would have.
Only request from SDK team here relevant to this feature, is if were upstreaming things like this, trying to prioritize getting proto compatability with what we shipped in Osmosis, even if field numbers may not align as conveniently. (In this case I don't think this applies, as we only add a field to genesis, which should have no conflicts with SDK, and we don't really care about)

Acceptance Criteria

  • Bank Supply offsets upstreamed to the SDK (or SDK team has expressed interest in not using them)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Needs Triage 🔍
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant