-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ContentType for Webwarp & WebAlign #51
Comments
Yes, I think you can create these two content type. Could we just ask @Tevemadar for a final check? |
@Majpuc @UlrikeS91 I would add a "description" and modify the "synonyms" of these content types to reflect that you are talking not about one file but a software specific file format (content type). The description should potentially include the base file format (e.g. json, ascii text, csv, etc) and more details on the content (inlc structure if helpful). From the current description (comments) they both contain the same type of data and it is unclear what the difference is. (that they are specific for the software is clear since it would be registered as the software specific content type; which is deducible already from the name) |
@Tevemadar could you please provide: WebAlign:
Webwarp:
|
Hi, |
@Tevemadar could you please provide us with a concrete suggestion. I've started writing something for the description for each content type below but please provide a correction / extension. How these dictionaries are actually structured (what keys, what values) is hard coded in the software, correct? If that is the case, then you can provide a link to the code as specification of these formats. If not, the description is sufficient write now. WebAlign (content type filename:
Webwarp (content type filename:
|
@Majpuc @Tevemadar can you help formulating a correct description for each content type? See first suggestion above. |
@Majpuc and @Tevemadar we need your feedback / help to complete these content types. Could you please have a look at the descriptions and provide corrections/completions? |
I'll try to look at them on Friday. |
While I don't really know what that field means, they may be a relatedMediaType to https://github.com/openMetadataInitiative/openMINDS_instances/blob/main/instances/latest/contentTypes/application_vnd.ebrains.image-service.deepzoom.jsonld
I don't know the level of detail needed here, the descriptions can be stripped of the "Internally" parts, to get a simple one. |
This is one half of the original issue #10.
Both Webwarp and WebAlign have been registered and published on the Knowledge Graph:
Webwarp (0.7): https://search.kg.ebrains.eu/instances/06358a83-5bf0-4271-b482-1efc10208a0e
WebAlign (v0.7): https://search.kg.ebrains.eu/instances/5258054a-8755-428d-8d0a-cc7a344e95d9
We should register these content types now. @Majpuc suggested
with comment: "The waln file contains image registration information. This file type was created for WebAlign and don't exist elsewhere."
and
with comment: "The wwrp file contains image registration information. This file type was created for WebWarp and don't exist elsewhere."
@lzehl Do you think these make sense? Or should parts be changed? If these look fine, I can make the PR.
PS: I actively ignored NutilWeb since it is not published on the KG yet. @Majpuc, please open a new issue once the content types are actually needed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: