Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update lint dependencies to v6.5.0 #1617

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2023
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Aug 28, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin 6.4.1 -> 6.5.0 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser 6.4.1 -> 6.5.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v6.5.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [consistent-type-assertions] wrap object return value with parentheses (#​6885) (23ac499)

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

6.4.1 (2023-08-21)

Bug Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-condition] false positives with branded types (#​7466) (b52658f), closes #​7293

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v6.5.0

Compare Source

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

6.4.1 (2023-08-21)

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 28, 2023

🦙 MegaLinter status: ✅ SUCCESS

Descriptor Linter Files Fixed Errors Elapsed time
✅ EDITORCONFIG editorconfig-checker 2 0 0.02s
✅ JSON eslint-plugin-jsonc 1 0 0 1.54s
✅ JSON jsonlint 1 0 0.37s
✅ JSON npm-package-json-lint yes no 0.83s
✅ JSON prettier 1 0 0 0.41s
✅ JSON v8r 1 0 5.12s
✅ REPOSITORY checkov yes no 41.71s
✅ REPOSITORY git_diff yes no 0.01s
✅ REPOSITORY grype yes no 18.16s
✅ REPOSITORY trivy-sbom yes no 2.47s
✅ REPOSITORY trufflehog yes no 158.48s

See detailed report in MegaLinter reports
Set VALIDATE_ALL_CODEBASE: true in mega-linter.yml to validate all sources, not only the diff

MegaLinter is graciously provided by OX Security

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 28, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1617 (6210fc3) into master (30c8e6d) will increase coverage by 0.09%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1617      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.86%   82.96%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         157      157              
  Lines        4085     4085              
  Branches      731      731              
==========================================
+ Hits         3385     3389       +4     
+ Misses        700      696       -4     
Flag Coverage Δ
cypress 51.04% <ø> (ø)
jest 78.01% <ø> (+0.12%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

@buberdds buberdds merged commit 608ddd4 into master Aug 29, 2023
@buberdds buberdds deleted the renovate/lint-dependencies branch August 29, 2023 07:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant