-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: improve event-loop promise state tracking #52108
Conversation
b4b0a4c
to
d221af4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
I think we should remove |
Yes, the added test is flaky:
|
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
13e0e13
to
014d1b5
Compare
It should be now less flaky. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Are the test failures related to my patch? I have no osx-arm machine to check it. |
71b3502
to
691b724
Compare
@Uzlopak they do not seem to be related |
691b724
to
a5dc9a3
Compare
@BridgeAR |
a5dc9a3
to
6fd930b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still lgtm
Whoa!!!! the CI is green. the CI is green! |
Landed in be8d64e |
PR-URL: nodejs#52108 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #52108 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #52108 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs#52108 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs#52108 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Fixes #43655
Fixes #34851
Superseeds #34862
@nodejs/performance
Can you help me with the changes in my last commit? I adapted changes from #34862. This should improve the performance of rejected promises. Maybe you have some concerns regarding the the changes. I am not that convinced from the last commit.
Ty