-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal: Introduce CI builds to GitHub PR process #84
Proposal: Introduce CI builds to GitHub PR process #84
Comments
@rvagg has been working on the io.js CI - see https://github.com/iojs/build I'm pretty sure it was supposed to be enabled here but it doesn't seem to be? |
We're getting there, it's just not a trivial process, it's the next big thing on my list of things to do and I'll be spending some time this month on making it happen. Currently a limited set of people can trigger builds for any PR and I'm happy to expand that list to include any other people with commit access to io.js if they want to help test incomings. Another problem we have is that the test suite isn't quite solid enough yet and will result in a lot of false positives, we've been working on that and it's something that will improve over time as we start to get frustrated with them. |
Additionally, it'd be great to get the build status on the branch page as well (especially if branches become part of the workflow). |
This is being tracked in an issue on iojs/build. |
We should be introducing CI builds to the GitHub PR process to verify code integrity, tests and coverage for those contributing to the codebase.
There are plenty out there, Travis-CI, Drone, Hosted Jenkins.
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: