test: fix 'checks' validation test for checkPrime

This test had two problems:

* The first argument was a number in both cases, which is what caused
  the (expected) ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE error -- the validity of the
  'checks' option was not actually verified at all. Thus, the first
  argument should be valid for this particular test.
* The function returned by common.mustNotCall() was passed to
  assert.throws() as a third argument instead of being passed to
  checkPrime() as a third argument. (Isn't JavaScript great?) This again
  led to the (expected) ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE error, but again, the
  validity of the 'checks' option was not verified.

Fix both issues by ensuring that all arguments except the 'checks'
option are valid.

Refs: #36997
PR-URL: #47139
Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>

test/parallel/test-crypto-prime.js

@@ -229,14 +229,16 @@ generatePrime(
   });
 });
 
-['hello', {}, []].forEach((i) => {
-  assert.throws(() => checkPrime(2, { checks: i }), {
-    code: 'ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE'
-  }, common.mustNotCall());
-  assert.throws(() => checkPrimeSync(2, { checks: i }), {
-    code: 'ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE'
+for (const checks of ['hello', {}, []]) {
+  assert.throws(() => checkPrime(2n, { checks }, common.mustNotCall()), {
+    code: 'ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE',
+    message: /checks/
   });
-});
+  assert.throws(() => checkPrimeSync(2n, { checks }), {
+    code: 'ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE',
+    message: /checks/
+  });
+}
 
 assert(!checkPrimeSync(Buffer.from([0x1])));
 assert(checkPrimeSync(Buffer.from([0x2])));