Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Node.js Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Meeting 2023-10-04 #1446

Closed
mhdawson opened this issue Oct 2, 2023 · 12 comments
Closed

Node.js Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Meeting 2023-10-04 #1446

mhdawson opened this issue Oct 2, 2023 · 12 comments
Assignees

Comments

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

mhdawson commented Oct 2, 2023

Time

UTC Wed 04-Oct-2023 15:00 (03:00 PM):

Timezone Date/Time
US / Pacific Wed 04-Oct-2023 08:00 (08:00 AM)
US / Mountain Wed 04-Oct-2023 09:00 (09:00 AM)
US / Central Wed 04-Oct-2023 10:00 (10:00 AM)
US / Eastern Wed 04-Oct-2023 11:00 (11:00 AM)
EU / Western Wed 04-Oct-2023 16:00 (04:00 PM)
EU / Central Wed 04-Oct-2023 17:00 (05:00 PM)
EU / Eastern Wed 04-Oct-2023 18:00 (06:00 PM)
Moscow Wed 04-Oct-2023 18:00 (06:00 PM)
Chennai Wed 04-Oct-2023 20:30 (08:30 PM)
Hangzhou Wed 04-Oct-2023 23:00 (11:00 PM)
Tokyo Thu 05-Oct-2023 00:00 (12:00 AM)
Sydney Thu 05-Oct-2023 02:00 (02:00 AM)

Or in your local time:

Links

Agenda

Extracted from tsc-agenda labelled issues and pull requests from the nodejs org prior to the meeting.

nodejs/TSC

  • When to make --default-type=module the Node.js default #1445

nodejs/admin

  • Collaborator Changes - More Privacy #834
  • Have a mascot #828
  • Create nodejs/socket repository for Node.js implementation of Cloudflare's Socket API #826

Invited

Observers/Guests

Notes

The agenda comes from issues labelled with tsc-agenda across all of the repositories in the nodejs org. Please label any additional issues that should be on the agenda before the meeting starts.

Joining the meeting

Zoom link: https://zoom.us/j/611357642
Regular password

Public participation

We stream our conference call straight to YouTube so anyone can listen to it live, it should start playing at https://www.youtube.com/c/nodejs+foundation/live when we turn it on. There's usually a short cat-herding time at the start of the meeting and then occasionally we have some quick private business to attend to before we can start recording & streaming. So be patient and it should show up.


Invitees

Please use the following emoji reactions in this post to indicate your
availability.

  • 👍 - Attending
  • 👎 - Not attending
  • 😕 - Not sure yet
@mhdawson mhdawson self-assigned this Oct 2, 2023
@GeoffreyBooth
Copy link
Member

I think we can remove nodejs/node#48740 from the agenda, the tsc-agenda tag was removed from that PR.

@mcollina
Copy link
Member

mcollina commented Oct 3, 2023

I recommend we talk about nodejs/node#49344: If you use ESM with Node.js v20 there are no solutions to reliably getting code coverage. I recommend we postpone marking v20 as LTS until this is resolved.

@GeoffreyBooth
Copy link
Member

I recommend we postpone marking v20 as LTS until this is resolved.

How would that work? We delay releasing 21.0.0? Doesn’t 20 become LTS automatically when 21 is released?

@richardlau
Copy link
Member

I recommend we postpone marking v20 as LTS until this is resolved.

How would that work? We delay releasing 21.0.0? Doesn’t 20 become LTS automatically when 21 is released?

@GeoffreyBooth No it does not. The releases are independent and follow the timelines in https://github.com/nodejs/Release. On current schedules there's a 1 week period where both Node.js 21 and Node.js 20 are current releases[1]. "Current" is a description applied to a release line, it is not a singular noun.

[1] A long time ago the schedules were the other way around and the even release became LTS the week before the new semver major was cut which meant a period when there was no release marked current.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

mhdawson commented Oct 4, 2023

I think that delaying is a serious action as people make plans around the LTS dates. If we knew we'd have a fix in 1 or 2 weeks then a delay might make sense, but if it's an unknown slip I'm not so sure.

@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented Oct 4, 2023

If a delay is undesirable, and a fix isn't forthcoming, is a revert warranted?

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Oct 4, 2023

It seems like a V8 bug. I don't know what we could revert?

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

joyeecheung commented Oct 4, 2023

It doesn't seem we have a fix in sight, and we don't know when this started (possibly caused by one of the V8 upgrades?). I think we have many other occasions where something can cause a regression and we move on with the LTS schedule - take the vm issues that are still blocking jest users from upgrading from v16 which is now EOL for example, even though we had clearer ideas what was going on and what needed to be done by V8 to fix that, and it apparently had a wide impact, we didn't block any release because they were unfixed.

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

Also I am not sure what postponing v20 LTS is going to achieve if we have no idea how to fix it yet...I think we should only postpone LTS when it's clear that it needs some semver-major changes to fix - from the glance of the bug though I doubt if that's likely, this probably goes back to some bug in the V8 platform/task runner/garbage collector, the fix is more likely to be semver-patch and if so, we could backport it to v20 when it gets figured out.

@richardlau
Copy link
Member

Also I am not sure what postponing v20 LTS is going to achieve if we have no idea how to fix it yet...I think we should only postpone LTS when it's clear that it needs some semver-major changes to fix

Semver-major changes would not normally be allowed to land on any release line (including Node.js 20) regardless of status (current, LTS, etc.).

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

Ah, yes, then postponing LTS is less useful to unblock anything, as the branch has already been cut for the LTS.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

mhdawson commented Oct 4, 2023

PR for minutes - #1450

@mhdawson mhdawson closed this as completed Oct 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants