You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This comment is based on my experience with netbox 2.9.10 -
Netbox is currently unable to handle more than one worker as the only available result for a given task is the latest one AFAIK.
This, I believe would require an overhaul of how the scripts are being run and their results accessed.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Please see our contributing guide.
This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.
Environment
Proposed Functionality
The way that netbox-rq service it's named today, we are able to get only one worker at a time. Based on RQ documentation we should just spawn another process using
systemctl
and the units files templates.This will touch on the unit file name and perhaps the description.
Use Case
If you wanna multiples workers consuming from a queue and perhaps some jobs take some considerable amount of time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: