You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
i think having multiple different basis sets is not a good idea to solve convergence problems. it's cumbersome to explain (e.g. in a paper) and i think the calculation would effectively have to be considered to have the accuracy of the weaker basis set. I think preferable is just to use the weaker basis set for the whole calculation. But perhaps in some cases this still makes sense.
in my experience, diffuse functions are the main source of convergence problems (e.g. the "+" in pople basis sets) and using the solution of a slightly "less diffuse" basis as the initial guess usually helps
Good to be mindful for what calculations diffuse basis sets are needed (e.g. a must for anions; but not so important for e.g. the geometry of neutral species).
but of course this functionality in the plugin would be useful regardless :)
Gaussian supports selecting different basis sets for different atom types. See how to do it in the following input example:
It might be the way to go if we encounter SCF convergence problems in the future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: