Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

buildkit WCOW cannot seemingly run RUN powershell ..., while vanilla dockerd can #4901

Open
doctorpangloss opened this issue May 4, 2024 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #5446
Open

buildkit WCOW cannot seemingly run RUN powershell ..., while vanilla dockerd can #4901

doctorpangloss opened this issue May 4, 2024 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #5446

Comments

@doctorpangloss
Copy link

Dockerfile:

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022
# example: install chocolatey
RUN powershell -NoProfile -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -Command "[System.Net.ServicePointManager]::SecurityProtocol = [System.Net.ServicePointManager]::SecurityProtocol -bor 3072; iex ((New-Object System.Net.WebClient).DownloadString('https://community.chocolatey.org/install.ps1'))"

This errors with "is not a command" on buildkit / containerd (latest), runs fine in dockerd.

@lippertmarkus
Copy link

lippertmarkus commented May 6, 2024

To provide a bit more context:

The following works:

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022
RUN C:/Windows/System32/WindowsPowerShell/v1.0/powershell.exe write-host Hello

# Outputs: Hello

While this doesn't:

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022
RUN powershell.exe write-host Hello

# Error: 'powershell.exe' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
# operable program or batch file.

Seems that it doesn't load the PATH correctly. Docker/nerdctl works fine:

nerdctl.exe run --rm -it mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022 powershell hello

# Outputs: hello

Additionally, buildkit seems to persist the PATH issue to the generated image:

# Default servercore
nerdctl run --rm mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022 cmd /c echo %PATH%
# C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps

# image built with buildkit based on servercore
nerdctl run --rm -it my-buildkit-image:latest cmd /c echo %PATH%
# c:\Windows\System32;c:\Windows

Versions:
containerd v1.7.16
buildkitd v0.13.2

@lippertmarkus
Copy link

ref #4895 #3158

@profnandaa
Copy link
Collaborator

Sure, we're picking up this discussion from #3158 // For the time-being, a work-around will be adding this at the beginning:

SHELL ["C:\\Windows\\System32\\WindowsPowerShell\\v1.0\\powershell"]

@profnandaa
Copy link
Collaborator

/cc. @danielGithinji

@danielGithinji
Copy link
Contributor

danielGithinji commented Jun 13, 2024

Another workaround that should help solve this issue is by changing the PATH environment variable. This can be done by using the ENV dockerfile command i.e:

ENV PATH="C\yourPath

By using docker you can also grab the container path and use the ENV command to modify the path in your dockerfile as shown above. That way any executable in the path will be accessible.

A docker command to grab the path is as follows:

docker run -it mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022 cmd /S /C set path

profnandaa added a commit to profnandaa/buildkit that referenced this issue Oct 23, 2024
…ibility

The current default `PATH` has been set to the most basic subset for both
`nanoserver` and `servercore`.

```go
const DefaultPathEnvWindows = "c:\\Windows\\System32;c:\\Windows;
```

The path to `powershell.exe` is conspicuously missing hence breaking the
developer experience for most workloads that depend on PS.

This fix proposes to append `;C:\\Windows\\System32\\WindowsPowerShell\\v1.0`
to that list to support PS scenarios, that make a big chunk of workloads,
especially legacy ones, migrating from on-prem to cloud.

Fixes moby#4901, microsoft/Windows-Containers#500
Ref moby#3158

Implication for nanoserver:
===========================
This does not any way break the experiences for those using `nanoserver` base image,
as much as PS and the `C:\\Windows\\System32\\WindowsPowerShell\\v1.0` path is not present
on `nanoserver`.

Transition users to using `ENV`:
==============================
Users coming from classic `docker build` will need to transition from using `RUN setx /M`
to `ENV` as a way of persisting environment variables in the images.

We can take a hit on not supporting backward compatibility for `RUN setx /M`, as opposed
to not supporting both `RUN setx /M` and `RUN powershell` as it is the case right now.

Alternative considered:
=======================
We thought of an option to ask the Windows platform team
to add a default `Config.Env.PATH` in the config file for the base image.
However, this causes a regression for `RUN setx /M` on the classic `docker build`.
There could be a couple of more people too that might be depending on `Config.Env = null`
as it is currently. See `docker inspect mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022`.

Here is the regression details when we set `ENV` in the base image.

```
PS> type .\Dockerfile
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022 AS newbase
ENV PATH="C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps"

FROM newbase
RUN setx /M PATH "C:\my\path;%PATH%"
RUN echo %PATH%

PS> docker build --no-cache -t profnandaa/servercore-path-tests .

Sending build context to Docker daemon  2.048kB
Step 1/5 : FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022 AS newbase
---> e64ba0f4256b
Step 2/5 : ENV PATH="C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps"
---> Running in ab3dc4921d7d
---> Removed intermediate container ab3dc4921d7d
---> f57b0a2d0e28
Step 3/5 : FROM newbase
---> f57b0a2d0e28
Step 4/5 : RUN setx /M PATH "%PATH%;C:\my\path;"
---> Running in 6ca6171334a0

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.
---> Removed intermediate container 6ca6171334a0
---> 6d2870e2f91d
Step 5/5 : RUN echo %PATH%
---> Running in 785633e2a31c
C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps
   ^
   | ~~~~~~~~~ notice "C:\my\path" is missing, meaning `setx /M` is not persisting as before.

---> Removed intermediate container 785633e2a31c
---> ed490181b903
Successfully built ed490181b903
Successfully tagged profnandaa/servercore-path-tests:latest
```

Current `RUN setx /M` behavior:

```
PS> type .\Dockerfile

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022
RUN setx /M PATH "%PATH%;C:\my\path;"
RUN echo %PATH%

PS> docker build --no-cache -t profnandaa/servercore-path-tests .

Sending build context to Docker daemon  2.048kB
Step 1/3 : FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022
---> e64ba0f4256b
Step 2/3 : RUN setx /M PATH "C:\my\path;%PATH%"
---> Running in 5502dd679495

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.
---> Removed intermediate container 5502dd679495
---> 0b59f38e2da4
Step 3/3 : RUN echo %PATH%
---> Running in 3bacb0b27bad
C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps;C:\my\path;
                    ^
                    |~~~~ `setx /M` persists.
---> Removed intermediate container 3bacb0b27bad
---> cda1b4cd27ff
Successfully built cda1b4cd27ff
Successfully tagged profnandaa/servercore-path-tests:latest
```

`setx` vs. `ENV` has been discussed in details in moby#5445

Signed-off-by: Anthony Nandaa <[email protected]>
profnandaa added a commit to profnandaa/buildkit that referenced this issue Oct 23, 2024
…ibility

The current default `PATH` has been set to the most basic subset for both
`nanoserver` and `servercore`.

```go
const DefaultPathEnvWindows = "c:\\Windows\\System32;c:\\Windows;
```

The path to `powershell.exe` is conspicuously missing hence breaking the
developer experience for most workloads that depend on PS.

This fix proposes to append `;C:\\Windows\\System32\\WindowsPowerShell\\v1.0`
to that list to support PS scenarios, that make a big chunk of workloads,
especially legacy ones, migrating from on-prem to cloud.

Fixes moby#4901, microsoft/Windows-Containers#500
Ref moby#3158

Implication for nanoserver:
===========================
This does not any way break the experiences for those using `nanoserver` base image,
as much as PS and the `C:\\Windows\\System32\\WindowsPowerShell\\v1.0` path is not present
on `nanoserver`.

Transition users to using `ENV`:
==============================
Users coming from classic `docker build` will need to transition from using `RUN setx /M`
to `ENV` as a way of persisting environment variables in the images.

We can take a hit on not supporting backward compatibility for `RUN setx /M`, as opposed
to not supporting both `RUN setx /M` and `RUN powershell` as it is the case right now.

Alternative considered:
=======================
We thought of an option to ask the Windows platform team
to add a default `Config.Env.PATH` in the config file for the base image.
However, this causes a regression for `RUN setx /M` on the classic `docker build`.
There could be a couple of more people too that might be depending on `Config.Env = null`
as it is currently. See `docker inspect mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022`.

Here is the regression details when we set `ENV` in the base image.

```
PS> type .\Dockerfile
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022 AS newbase
ENV PATH="C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps"

FROM newbase
RUN setx /M PATH "C:\my\path;%PATH%"
RUN echo %PATH%

PS> docker build --no-cache -t profnandaa/servercore-path-tests .

Sending build context to Docker daemon  2.048kB
Step 1/5 : FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022 AS newbase
---> e64ba0f4256b
Step 2/5 : ENV PATH="C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps"
---> Running in ab3dc4921d7d
---> Removed intermediate container ab3dc4921d7d
---> f57b0a2d0e28
Step 3/5 : FROM newbase
---> f57b0a2d0e28
Step 4/5 : RUN setx /M PATH "%PATH%;C:\my\path;"
---> Running in 6ca6171334a0

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.
---> Removed intermediate container 6ca6171334a0
---> 6d2870e2f91d
Step 5/5 : RUN echo %PATH%
---> Running in 785633e2a31c
C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps
   ^
   | ~~~~~~~~~ notice "C:\my\path" is missing, meaning `setx /M` is not persisting as before.

---> Removed intermediate container 785633e2a31c
---> ed490181b903
Successfully built ed490181b903
Successfully tagged profnandaa/servercore-path-tests:latest
```

Current `RUN setx /M` behavior:

```
PS> type .\Dockerfile

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022
RUN setx /M PATH "%PATH%;C:\my\path;"
RUN echo %PATH%

PS> docker build --no-cache -t profnandaa/servercore-path-tests .

Sending build context to Docker daemon  2.048kB
Step 1/3 : FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022
---> e64ba0f4256b
Step 2/3 : RUN setx /M PATH "C:\my\path;%PATH%"
---> Running in 5502dd679495

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.
---> Removed intermediate container 5502dd679495
---> 0b59f38e2da4
Step 3/3 : RUN echo %PATH%
---> Running in 3bacb0b27bad
C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps;C:\my\path;
                    ^
                    |~~~~ `setx /M` persists.
---> Removed intermediate container 3bacb0b27bad
---> cda1b4cd27ff
Successfully built cda1b4cd27ff
Successfully tagged profnandaa/servercore-path-tests:latest
```

`setx` vs. `ENV` has been discussed in details in moby#5445

Signed-off-by: Anthony Nandaa <[email protected]>
profnandaa added a commit to profnandaa/buildkit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2024
…ibility

The current default `PATH` has been set to the most basic subset for both
`nanoserver` and `servercore`.

```go
const DefaultPathEnvWindows = "c:\\Windows\\System32;c:\\Windows;
```

The path to `powershell.exe` is conspicuously missing hence breaking the
developer experience for most workloads that depend on PS.

This fix proposes to append `;C:\\Windows\\System32\\WindowsPowerShell\\v1.0`
to that list to support PS scenarios, that make a big chunk of workloads,
especially legacy ones, migrating from on-prem to cloud.

Fixes moby#4901, microsoft/Windows-Containers#500
Ref moby#3158

Implication for nanoserver:
===========================
This does not any way break the experiences for those using `nanoserver` base image,
as much as PS and the `C:\\Windows\\System32\\WindowsPowerShell\\v1.0` path is not present
on `nanoserver`.

Transition users to using `ENV`:
==============================
Users coming from classic `docker build` will need to transition from using `RUN setx /M`
to `ENV` as a way of persisting environment variables in the images.

We can take a hit on not supporting backward compatibility for `RUN setx /M`, as opposed
to not supporting both `RUN setx /M` and `RUN powershell` as it is the case right now.

Alternative considered:
=======================
We thought of an option to ask the Windows platform team
to add a default `Config.Env.PATH` in the config file for the base image.
However, this causes a regression for `RUN setx /M` on the classic `docker build`.
There could be a couple of more people too that might be depending on `Config.Env = null`
as it is currently. See `docker inspect mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022`.

Here is the regression details when we set `ENV` in the base image.

```
PS> type .\Dockerfile
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022 AS newbase
ENV PATH="C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps"

FROM newbase
RUN setx /M PATH "C:\my\path;%PATH%"
RUN echo %PATH%

PS> docker build --no-cache -t profnandaa/servercore-path-tests .

Sending build context to Docker daemon  2.048kB
Step 1/5 : FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022 AS newbase
---> e64ba0f4256b
Step 2/5 : ENV PATH="C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps"
---> Running in ab3dc4921d7d
---> Removed intermediate container ab3dc4921d7d
---> f57b0a2d0e28
Step 3/5 : FROM newbase
---> f57b0a2d0e28
Step 4/5 : RUN setx /M PATH "%PATH%;C:\my\path;"
---> Running in 6ca6171334a0

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.
---> Removed intermediate container 6ca6171334a0
---> 6d2870e2f91d
Step 5/5 : RUN echo %PATH%
---> Running in 785633e2a31c
C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps
   ^
   | ~~~~~~~~~ notice "C:\my\path" is missing, meaning `setx /M` is not persisting as before.

---> Removed intermediate container 785633e2a31c
---> ed490181b903
Successfully built ed490181b903
Successfully tagged profnandaa/servercore-path-tests:latest
```

Current `RUN setx /M` behavior:

```
PS> type .\Dockerfile

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022
RUN setx /M PATH "%PATH%;C:\my\path;"
RUN echo %PATH%

PS> docker build --no-cache -t profnandaa/servercore-path-tests .

Sending build context to Docker daemon  2.048kB
Step 1/3 : FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022
---> e64ba0f4256b
Step 2/3 : RUN setx /M PATH "C:\my\path;%PATH%"
---> Running in 5502dd679495

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.
---> Removed intermediate container 5502dd679495
---> 0b59f38e2da4
Step 3/3 : RUN echo %PATH%
---> Running in 3bacb0b27bad
C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps;C:\my\path;
                    ^
                    |~~~~ `setx /M` persists.
---> Removed intermediate container 3bacb0b27bad
---> cda1b4cd27ff
Successfully built cda1b4cd27ff
Successfully tagged profnandaa/servercore-path-tests:latest
```

`setx` vs. `ENV` has been discussed in details in moby#5445

Signed-off-by: Anthony Nandaa <[email protected]>
profnandaa added a commit to profnandaa/buildkit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2024
…ibility

The current default `PATH` has been set to the most basic subset for both
`nanoserver` and `servercore`.

```go
const DefaultPathEnvWindows = "c:\\Windows\\System32;c:\\Windows;
```

The path to `powershell.exe` is conspicuously missing hence breaking the
developer experience for most workloads that depend on PS.

This fix proposes to append `;C:\\Windows\\System32\\WindowsPowerShell\\v1.0`
to that list to support PS scenarios, that make a big chunk of workloads,
especially legacy ones, migrating from on-prem to cloud.

Fixes moby#4901, microsoft/Windows-Containers#500
Ref moby#3158

Implication for nanoserver:
===========================
This does not any way break the experiences for those using `nanoserver` base image,
as much as PS and the `C:\\Windows\\System32\\WindowsPowerShell\\v1.0` path is not present
on `nanoserver`.

Transition users to using `ENV`:
==============================
Users coming from classic `docker build` will need to transition from using `RUN setx /M`
to `ENV` as a way of persisting environment variables in the images.

We can take a hit on not supporting backward compatibility for `RUN setx /M`, as opposed
to not supporting both `RUN setx /M` and `RUN powershell` as it is the case right now.

Alternative considered:
=======================
We thought of an option to ask the Windows platform team
to add a default `Config.Env.PATH` in the config file for the base image.
However, this causes a regression for `RUN setx /M` on the classic `docker build`.
There could be a couple of more people too that might be depending on `Config.Env = null`
as it is currently. See `docker inspect mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022`.

Here is the regression details when we set `ENV` in the base image.

```
PS> type .\Dockerfile
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022 AS newbase
ENV PATH="C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps"

FROM newbase
RUN setx /M PATH "C:\my\path;%PATH%"
RUN echo %PATH%

PS> docker build --no-cache -t profnandaa/servercore-path-tests .

Sending build context to Docker daemon  2.048kB
Step 1/5 : FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022 AS newbase
---> e64ba0f4256b
Step 2/5 : ENV PATH="C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps"
---> Running in ab3dc4921d7d
---> Removed intermediate container ab3dc4921d7d
---> f57b0a2d0e28
Step 3/5 : FROM newbase
---> f57b0a2d0e28
Step 4/5 : RUN setx /M PATH "%PATH%;C:\my\path;"
---> Running in 6ca6171334a0

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.
---> Removed intermediate container 6ca6171334a0
---> 6d2870e2f91d
Step 5/5 : RUN echo %PATH%
---> Running in 785633e2a31c
C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps
   ^
   | ~~~~~~~~~ notice "C:\my\path" is missing, meaning `setx /M` is not persisting as before.

---> Removed intermediate container 785633e2a31c
---> ed490181b903
Successfully built ed490181b903
Successfully tagged profnandaa/servercore-path-tests:latest
```

Current `RUN setx /M` behavior:

```
PS> type .\Dockerfile

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022
RUN setx /M PATH "%PATH%;C:\my\path;"
RUN echo %PATH%

PS> docker build --no-cache -t profnandaa/servercore-path-tests .

Sending build context to Docker daemon  2.048kB
Step 1/3 : FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022
---> e64ba0f4256b
Step 2/3 : RUN setx /M PATH "C:\my\path;%PATH%"
---> Running in 5502dd679495

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.
---> Removed intermediate container 5502dd679495
---> 0b59f38e2da4
Step 3/3 : RUN echo %PATH%
---> Running in 3bacb0b27bad
C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps;C:\my\path;
                    ^
                    |~~~~ `setx /M` persists.
---> Removed intermediate container 3bacb0b27bad
---> cda1b4cd27ff
Successfully built cda1b4cd27ff
Successfully tagged profnandaa/servercore-path-tests:latest
```

`setx` vs. `ENV` has been discussed in details in moby#5445

Signed-off-by: Anthony Nandaa <[email protected]>
profnandaa added a commit to profnandaa/buildkit that referenced this issue Nov 6, 2024
The current default `PATH` has been set to the most basic subset for both
`nanoserver` and `servercore`.

```go
const DefaultPathEnvWindows = "c:\\Windows\\System32;c:\\Windows;
```

The path to `powershell.exe` is conspicuously missing hence breaking the
developer experience for most workloads that depend on PS.

This fix proposes to append `;C:\\Windows\\System32\\WindowsPowerShell\\v1.0`
to that list to support PS scenarios, that make a big chunk of workloads,
especially legacy ones, migrating from on-prem to cloud.

Fixes moby#4901, microsoft/Windows-Containers#500
Ref moby#3158

Implication for nanoserver:
===========================
This does not any way break the experiences for those using `nanoserver` base image,
as much as PS and the `C:\\Windows\\System32\\WindowsPowerShell\\v1.0` path is not present
on `nanoserver`.

Transition users to using `ENV`:
==============================
Users coming from classic `docker build` will need to transition from using `RUN setx /M`
to `ENV` as a way of persisting environment variables in the images.

We can take a hit on not supporting backward compatibility for `RUN setx /M`, as opposed
to not supporting both `RUN setx /M` and `RUN powershell` as it is the case right now.

Alternative considered:
=======================
We thought of an option to ask the Windows platform team
to add a default `Config.Env.PATH` in the config file for the base image.
However, this causes a regression for `RUN setx /M` on the classic `docker build`.
There could be a couple of more people too that might be depending on `Config.Env = null`
as it is currently. See `docker inspect mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022`.

Here is the regression details when we set `ENV` in the base image.

```
PS> type .\Dockerfile
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022 AS newbase
ENV PATH="C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps"

FROM newbase
RUN setx /M PATH "C:\my\path;%PATH%"
RUN echo %PATH%

PS> docker build --no-cache -t profnandaa/servercore-path-tests .

Sending build context to Docker daemon  2.048kB
Step 1/5 : FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022 AS newbase
---> e64ba0f4256b
Step 2/5 : ENV PATH="C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps"
---> Running in ab3dc4921d7d
---> Removed intermediate container ab3dc4921d7d
---> f57b0a2d0e28
Step 3/5 : FROM newbase
---> f57b0a2d0e28
Step 4/5 : RUN setx /M PATH "%PATH%;C:\my\path;"
---> Running in 6ca6171334a0

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.
---> Removed intermediate container 6ca6171334a0
---> 6d2870e2f91d
Step 5/5 : RUN echo %PATH%
---> Running in 785633e2a31c
C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps
   ^
   | ~~~~~~~~~ notice "C:\my\path" is missing, meaning `setx /M` is not persisting as before.

---> Removed intermediate container 785633e2a31c
---> ed490181b903
Successfully built ed490181b903
Successfully tagged profnandaa/servercore-path-tests:latest
```

Current `RUN setx /M` behavior:

```
PS> type .\Dockerfile

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022
RUN setx /M PATH "%PATH%;C:\my\path;"
RUN echo %PATH%

PS> docker build --no-cache -t profnandaa/servercore-path-tests .

Sending build context to Docker daemon  2.048kB
Step 1/3 : FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:ltsc2022
---> e64ba0f4256b
Step 2/3 : RUN setx /M PATH "C:\my\path;%PATH%"
---> Running in 5502dd679495

SUCCESS: Specified value was saved.
---> Removed intermediate container 5502dd679495
---> 0b59f38e2da4
Step 3/3 : RUN echo %PATH%
---> Running in 3bacb0b27bad
C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Windows\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;C:\Windows\System32\OpenSSH\;C:\Users\ContainerAdministrator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowsApps;C:\my\path;
                    ^
                    |~~~~ `setx /M` persists.
---> Removed intermediate container 3bacb0b27bad
---> cda1b4cd27ff
Successfully built cda1b4cd27ff
Successfully tagged profnandaa/servercore-path-tests:latest
```

`setx` vs. `ENV` has been discussed in details in moby#5445

Signed-off-by: Anthony Nandaa <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants