From 8b40c4401b13340f3e55439f2b617d56352617e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tyler Headley <84789498+tylerheadley@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 13:40:11 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Update notes.tex: fix typo

change "you're job isn't calculus" to "your job isn't calculus"
---
 topic05_LearningFromData_Overfitting/notes.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/topic05_LearningFromData_Overfitting/notes.tex b/topic05_LearningFromData_Overfitting/notes.tex
index ea7ae79..d6d0503 100644
--- a/topic05_LearningFromData_Overfitting/notes.tex
+++ b/topic05_LearningFromData_Overfitting/notes.tex
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ \section*{Section 4.2: Regularization}
 
 \textit{NOTE:}
 This is a common interview question, and something that you should be able to do ``without thinking''.
-I happen to think it's a bad interview question in the sense that it doesn't directly measure what you'll be doing on the job (you're job isn't calculus).
+I happen to think it's a bad interview question in the sense that it doesn't directly measure what you'll be doing on the job (your job isn't calculus).
 That said, the ability to solve this problem correlates pretty highly with having a detailed mathematical understanding of machine learning concepts that are practical on the job,
 and so ``lazy'' interviewers will ask this to get a sense of your math abilities.
 \end{problem}