You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi! I was wondering if anybody had gone through the dvc in 2D of the finite hypothesis classes we went over. Specifically, for multiaxis2 and multiaxis3. I understand for multiaxis2 it is quadrants, so one positive quadrant and then the rest are negative. I was wondering if we are able to flip, like have one negative quadrant and 3 positive ones? Similarly, I may be confused on multiaxis3's size. We have M = 3^d, so = 9 in 2D space, but since it's the union of axis2 and mutliaxis2 that adds up to 8. What is that additional hypothesis?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am not sure I am right
The first, I think, yes. Assume d = 2. If we want the first quadrant to be negative, the rest positive, we can use (-1,-1) as weights for input (x1,x2). But it's also strange to me that if a point is in the second quadrant, and really close to the y axis, say (-1,6), the sign would be negative (-1 * -1 + -1 * 6 = -5) whereas if the point in the second axis is close to x axis (-10, 1), the sign would be positive (-1 * -10 + -1 * 1) . So my guess is that multiaxis2 could ensure that one specific axis is classified to a certain sign, but it can't guarantee the rest would be classified to an opposite sign.
The second, d = 2, the weight could be (0,0), which is the extra hypothesis besides axis2 and multiaxis2.
These are all good questions, but I think they're complicated enough I'd have to go over them on a whiteboard in person and not just in the comments section here, sorry.
Hi! I was wondering if anybody had gone through the dvc in 2D of the finite hypothesis classes we went over. Specifically, for multiaxis2 and multiaxis3. I understand for multiaxis2 it is quadrants, so one positive quadrant and then the rest are negative. I was wondering if we are able to flip, like have one negative quadrant and 3 positive ones? Similarly, I may be confused on multiaxis3's size. We have M = 3^d, so = 9 in 2D space, but since it's the union of axis2 and mutliaxis2 that adds up to 8. What is that additional hypothesis?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: