-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
About rolling_online_management again #572
Comments
For speeding up the data processing, you can refer to this issue |
Thank you for the suggestion. |
@yieldbook |
|
@yieldbook We are drafting a demo to show a case to dump the processed data to the disk to avoid duplicated data processing |
@you-n-g Thanks a lot for the demo. It's much much faster now, but dumping the handler to disk and loading it again is still too slow, especially when the handler is huge. It's better to keep the handler in memory and update the segment in every loop. That should be really efficient. |
@yieldbook We updated that demo to show a case to dump the process data to the memory to reduce disk IO #606 Please check if the demo answers your question and help to review it. |
@Wangwuyi123 Thanks a lot. It's very helpful. I have a following up question. In the old backtest function, I can pass the pred_score generated from the rolling tasks directly to the backtest, but in the new backtest function, pred_score is no longer accepted. How can I backtest the rolling tasks? |
@yieldbook |
This issue is stale because it has been open for three months with no activity. Remove the stale label or comment on the issue otherwise this will be closed in 5 days |
@yieldbook |
❓ Questions and Help
If I set the rolling_step = 20, there will be more than 100 tasks to run and it takes more than 10 minutes to init the data in a single task(some processors are really time consuming). Any suggestion for me to speed up the data processing? Can these tasks run concurrently?
Thanks a lot!
We sincerely suggest you to carefully read the documentation of our library as well as the official paper. After that, if you still feel puzzled, please describe the question clearly under this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: