-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 215
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sequence/regex schemas #180
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Comments
ikitommi
added
enhancement
New feature or request
for discussion
Discussion is main focus of PR
labels
Feb 21, 2020
When designing it, the scenario of implementing the equivalent of For info, I would use both conform and unform if malli has it. |
This was referenced Mar 5, 2020
Closed
Closed
ikitommi
added
Clojurists Together
Sponsored by Clojurists Together Q3 2020
and removed
for discussion
Discussion is main focus of PR
labels
Sep 10, 2020
ikitommi
removed
the
Clojurists Together
Sponsored by Clojurists Together Q3 2020
label
Nov 29, 2020
Master! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
From slack:
like clojure.spec.alpha/conform, there could be something for that? Explain could return either failures or real values if no errors exist.
and/or, an anonymous variant:
using for example https://github.com/cgrand/seqexp under the hoods
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: