Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Protect privacy by providing way of stripping EXIF and other metadata on images (SPEC-249) #113

Open
matrixbot opened this issue Oct 11, 2015 · 0 comments
Labels
A-Client-Server Issues affecting the CS API feature Suggestion for a significant extension which needs considerable consideration

Comments

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member

Submitted by @​matthew:matrix.org
Unclear whether this should be done client-by-client (and risk clients getting it wrong and breaking privacy), or a helpful function which we can recommend the content repository to implement...

(Imported from https://matrix.org/jira/browse/SPEC-249)

@matrixbot matrixbot changed the title Protect privacy by providing way of stripping EXIF and other metadata on images Protect privacy by providing way of stripping EXIF and other metadata on images (SPEC-249) Oct 31, 2016
@matrixbot matrixbot added the spec-bug Something which is in the spec, but is wrong label Nov 7, 2016
@turt2live turt2live added feature Suggestion for a significant extension which needs considerable consideration question Further information is requested and removed spec-bug Something which is in the spec, but is wrong labels Aug 7, 2018
@turt2live turt2live added the A-Client-Server Issues affecting the CS API label Feb 6, 2019
@richvdh richvdh transferred this issue from matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals Mar 1, 2022
@richvdh richvdh removed the question Further information is requested label Mar 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-Client-Server Issues affecting the CS API feature Suggestion for a significant extension which needs considerable consideration
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants