Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

It's easy to forget .evaluate_sequential() and .update_best_individual(). #115

Open
luleyleo opened this issue Sep 8, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

It's easy to forget .evaluate_sequential() and .update_best_individual(). #115

luleyleo opened this issue Sep 8, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
discussion There is some decision that can not be made alone enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@luleyleo
Copy link
Collaborator

luleyleo commented Sep 8, 2022

It is easy to forget

.evaluate_sequential()
.update_best_individual()

when constructing a heuristic. (See #114)

Maybe we can warn the user and/or make it easier to include them.

Something like

Configuration::builder()
        .do_with_eval_(initialization::RandomSpread::new_init(
            params.initial_population_size,
        ))

might be nice.
@luleyleo luleyleo added enhancement New feature or request discussion There is some decision that can not be made alone labels Sep 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
discussion There is some decision that can not be made alone enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@luleyleo