-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
General Language Improvements #1365
Comments
i think we're going with so maybe a good title would be |
Validators tokens' can be Delegators tokens can be |
@rigelrozanski should we avoid calling this the |
IMO I would remove all reference to the word "stake" in the UI - I find it confusing - alternatively (IMO less desirable) we could remove absolutely all reference to the word |
side thought - I wonder if we should rename the staking module (which is the only use of the word stake in the sdk) to bondage - it's kinda confusing because the module deals with both bonding and delegations - not sure... maybe this should still be the one use case for the word staking; the system of bonding and delegating |
Let's not go there. This will be weird for developers. And we don't want to be seen as weird, we want to show trust in our code and in our platform. |
We agreed in the meeting to change the header to |
@NodeGuy (CC @faboweb @jbibla ) The language just suggested is inconsistent with how staking works (and is oxymoronic in the context of how we use the terms). - please refer to some of the original language discussions - #1283 (comment) The validator object does not itself delegate (however the operator of the validator does have a self-delegation) - there are a number of different situations which will cause the validator's tokens to move from the |
We want to avoid the use of the word |
takeaways from the call with @faboweb and @rigelrozanski : General
TmBalance
LiValidator and PageValidator
My Delegations Tab
|
Thanks for the writeup @jbibla - p.s. we should probably update to use |
thank you for the time and ideas! this is being tracked separately #1378. |
Thank you, @jbibla. Would you please put that somewhere that's easy to find, like a Google Doc? I imagine we're going to need to reference it frequently in the future. |
Great idea |
May I suggest a docs section in the voyager repo to house the most updated language decisions/discussions? - we use a |
The validators on the my stake page are not unstaked, they are currently unstaking.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: