You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
venvstacks assumes that there will be a containing runtime application which handles unpacking everything appropriately on the destination system.
While that certainly covers a lot of use cases, it would also be interesting to support something akin to the --scie lazy options that pex supports: https://docs.pex-tool.org/scie.html#lazy-scies (where previously installed components are used if they exist on the destination system, but downloaded if they aren't). (This lazy runtime installation feature in pex is the closest thing I've found to a previously existing solution for what venvstacks offers, but even it is missing the ability to separate and share framework layers between applications).
The question mark on this issue title comes from the fact that I'm not sure this idea should be a venvstacks feature. It feels like it would be more appropriate in a wrapper utility that uses venvstacks to build the layer archives, and then something like pex to turn those layers into a standalone executable.
venvstacks
assumes that there will be a containing runtime application which handles unpacking everything appropriately on the destination system.While that certainly covers a lot of use cases, it would also be interesting to support something akin to the
--scie lazy
options thatpex
supports: https://docs.pex-tool.org/scie.html#lazy-scies (where previously installed components are used if they exist on the destination system, but downloaded if they aren't). (This lazy runtime installation feature inpex
is the closest thing I've found to a previously existing solution for whatvenvstacks
offers, but even it is missing the ability to separate and share framework layers between applications).The question mark on this issue title comes from the fact that I'm not sure this idea should be a venvstacks feature. It feels like it would be more appropriate in a wrapper utility that uses
venvstacks
to build the layer archives, and then something likepex
to turn those layers into a standalone executable.Note "scie" (pronounced "ski") comes from https://github.com/a-scie/, and is the basis of https://docs.pex-tool.org/scie.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: