-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Explain unresolvable references better #20477
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
odersky
added
the
area:reporting
Error reporting including formatting, implicit suggestions, etc
label
May 27, 2024
@jchyb I had to add another test to the BestEffortCompilation blacklist. Here the compiler survives a MissingType exception in Typer but continuing leads to the same exception being thrown without a handler that reports an error. |
smarter
approved these changes
May 28, 2024
We run into problems when referring to a member of a self type of a class that it not also a member of the class from outside via an asSeenFrom. One example is in 11226.scala where we see: ```scala trait ManagedActorClassification { this: ActorEventBus => def unsubscribe(subscriber: Subscriber): Unit } class Unsubscriber(bus: ManagedActorClassification) { def test(a: ActorRef): Unit = bus.unsubscribe(a) // error } ``` The problem is that `unsubscribe` refers to the type `Subscriber` which is not resolvable as a member of `bus`. one idea could be to rule out type signatures like `unsubscribe`, similar how we rule out public signatures referring to private members. But this could rule out existing valid programs. For instance, the `unsubscribe` signature is unproblematic if it gets only called with prefixes that inherit `ActorEventBus`. You could say that the problem was instead that the type of `bus` was not specific enough. In the long term, maybe restructing the signature is the right move. But for now, we just try to give better error messages in the case of existing failures. Fixes scala#11226
Co-authored-by: Guillaume Martres <[email protected]>
WojciechMazur
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 9, 2024
Backports #20477 to the LTS branch. PR submitted by the release tooling. [skip ci]
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We run into problems when referring to a member of a self type of a class that it not also a member of the class from outside via an asSeenFrom.
One example is in 11226.scala where we see:
The problem is that
unsubscribe
refers to the typeSubscriber
which is not resolvable as a member ofbus
. one idea could be to rule out type signatures likeunsubscribe
, similar how we rule out public signatures referring to private members. But this could rule out existing valid programs. For instance, theunsubscribe
signature is unproblematic if it gets only called with prefixes that inheritActorEventBus
. You could say that the problem was instead that the type ofbus
was not specific enough.In the long term, maybe restricting the signature is the right move. But for now, we just try to give better error messages in the case of existing failures.
Fixes #11226