Add binary lits to syntax summaries

[som-snytt]

Some redundancy was omitted at #19405

https://dotty.epfl.ch/docs/reference/syntax.html

[som-snytt]

Sorry I forgot how to turn off CI over here.

[odersky]

One question: The tooling people said they want to be notifed of any changes to syntax before the syntax is rolled in. Did that happen? @tgodzik @gabro are you aware that this change has landed?

[tgodzik]

One question: The tooling people said they want to be notifed of any changes to syntax before the syntax is rolled in. Did that happen? @tgodzik @gabro are you aware that this change has landed?

Hmm... I don't think it did happen. We will need to take a look into it.

[odersky]

Changes LGTM

[odersky]

@tgodzik @gabro Are you OK with merging this now, and you'll look into the tooling separately? Or should we hold?

[tgodzik]

@tgodzik @gabro Are you OK with merging this now, and you'll look into the tooling separately? Or should we hold?

I will not be able to take a look at it soon, so I would opt to hold off for a bit. I will try to find time on the weekend to take a look at it, but I can't promise anything.

[bishabosha]

@tgodzik heads up it was also already merged in scala 2.13

[tgodzik]

Och, that ship has sailed then 😨 I will try to get some time to work on it.

[odersky]

It will land in 3.5.

[tgodzik]

We added support in the latest version of Scalameta 3.9.0 scalameta/scalameta#3543