Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add glibc version constraints to the kubelet package #3246

Open
saschagrunert opened this issue Sep 5, 2023 · 12 comments
Open

Add glibc version constraints to the kubelet package #3246

saschagrunert opened this issue Sep 5, 2023 · 12 comments
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release.

Comments

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

saschagrunert commented Sep 5, 2023

kubernetes/kubernetes#118996 (#3076) will land in Kubernetes 1.29, containing a switch to debian:bookworm. This means we now require glibc 2.36 (compared to 2.31 on bullseye) for non static binaries like the kubelet.

The package of the kubelet could contain a constraint like this to highlight possible incompatibilities:

Requires: glibc >= 2.36

This needs to be done per release branch, while only affecting 1.29. We could also add a similar constraint to previous release branches (with 2.31).

cc @kubernetes/release-managers

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority labels Sep 5, 2023
@saschagrunert saschagrunert moved this to ❌ Blocked in SIG Release - Packaging Sep 5, 2023
@saschagrunert saschagrunert moved this from ❌ Blocked to 🔖 Backlog in SIG Release - Packaging Sep 5, 2023
@saschagrunert saschagrunert added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. and removed needs-priority labels Sep 5, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. label Sep 5, 2023
@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Sep 5, 2023

We might upgrade the active branches to 1.21 as well so if that happens we need that constrain in the others as well

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

We'll bump back to bullseye with #3249, means we can add the 2.31 glibc constraint to all maintained release branches.

@dweineha
Copy link

Current Ubuntu LTS (22.04) uses 2.35 (and the next version won't release until 5 months after Kubernetes 1.29). Am I understanding things correctly that Kubernetes 1.29 won't be usable on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS?

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

Current Ubuntu LTS (22.04) uses 2.35 (and the next version won't release until 5 months after Kubernetes 1.29). Am I understanding things correctly that Kubernetes 1.29 won't be usable on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS?

No, we still support the previous glibc version from bullseye per https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/build/build-image/cross/VERSION

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 29, 2024
@pacoxu
Copy link
Member

pacoxu commented Jan 29, 2024

/remove-lifecycle stale

We meet the problem in #3430. Current workaround is to keep docker in 24.0 while docker v25.0 was released recently.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 29, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 28, 2024
@xmudrii
Copy link
Member

xmudrii commented May 20, 2024

/remove-lifecycle stale
/retitle Add glibc version constraints to the kubelet package

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 20, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot changed the title Add glibc version constraints to kubelet 1.29 package Add glibc version constraints to the kubelet package May 20, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 18, 2024
@xmudrii
Copy link
Member

xmudrii commented Aug 19, 2024

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 19, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 17, 2024
@xmudrii
Copy link
Member

xmudrii commented Nov 18, 2024

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release.
Projects
Status: 🔖 Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants