-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
W3C REC / JSON-LD 1.2/2.0 #3
Comments
They certainly could, but they’re dependent on standards work on RDF*. |
Is there a link to a ReSpec document for RDF*? Searching for "rdfstar" seems to be more practical. I found the mailing list: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star/ |
No spec for RDF*, yet; people have just been going off of Olaf's paper and the Blazegraph post. Of course, it does need to be spec'd, and there are a number of issues that aren't too clear. There is some good discussion on the mailing list you referenced, and it remains a great place for discussion, including about JSON-LD*. |
"ReSpec standards for RDF* and SPARQL*?" |
There is a draft spec being actively developed: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/rdf-star-cg-spec.html |
Could these developments be merged into JSON-LD 1.2 or 2.0?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: