Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is inlining still necessary? #21

Open
jfrolich opened this issue Apr 26, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Is inlining still necessary? #21

jfrolich opened this issue Apr 26, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@jfrolich
Copy link
Owner

Most clients now support the <style> tag, so is inlining still necessary. Perhaps it makes sense to deprecate smoothie or make the scope smaller and deprecate the style inlining?

@stephenmoloney
Copy link
Collaborator

stephenmoloney commented May 15, 2018

I think that we could deprecate it perhaps.

I think there are alternatives now that offer the same as this would if the scope was reduced.

The foundation templating was handy but that could be a separate lib.

@jfrolich
Copy link
Owner Author

Agree

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants