-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 236
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(prefer-expect-assertions): support onlyFunctionsWithAsyncKeyword
option
#677
feat(prefer-expect-assertions): support onlyFunctionsWithAsyncKeyword
option
#677
Conversation
5f9ef48
to
18fa140
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems like a reasonable option to have - aside from the code change I'd requested, all that's missing is updating the rules documentation :)
It would be good if you could reword your commit to be feat(prefer-expect-assertions)
instead of feat(async-only)
, but that's not a blocker.
asyncOnly
option
1cd06ab
to
01e41de
Compare
Hi @G-Rath, I think I addressed all your comments. |
@mcampa cheers, it's looking good - I am now wondering if maybe it should be something like What do you think? |
b7aee62
to
3e94e51
Compare
makes perfect sense, I'll make the change. |
3e94e51
to
580fc57
Compare
asyncOnly
optiononlyFunctionsWithAsyncKeyword
option
580fc57
to
9bc6d55
Compare
I believe all comments were addresses. Back to you @G-Rath 🤞 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome, let's ship it!
# [24.1.0](v24.0.2...v24.1.0) (2020-10-05) ### Features * **prefer-expect-assertions:** add `onlyFunctionsWithAsyncKeyword` option ([#677](#677)) ([d0cea37](d0cea37))
🎉 This PR is included in version 24.1.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
We would like to add this new option on the
prefer-expect-assertions
rule, so the rule only applies toasync
tests.I hope this you like this idea. I'm open for suggestions.