CS2 Discussion: Output: CS Octal/Binary Literal as ES2015?

[coffeescriptbot]

From @Inve1951 on 2016-09-25 11:03

I'm bringing this up because nobody did so yet.

Numers in CS like 0b1010 and 0o31 currently compile to 0xa and 0x19 respectively.
Doing that conversion during compilation is no longer neccessary since those literals are now natively supported in JS.

Omitting that conversion and outputting as-is could slightly increase the ouput's readability or reveal intention.

[coffeescriptbot]

From @JimPanic on 2016-09-25 12:50

Since that literally means less code: awesome! ;D

On 25 Sep 2016, at 13:03, Inve1951 [email protected] wrote:

I'm bringing this up because nobody did so yet.

Numers in CS like 0b1010 and 0o31 currently compile to 0xa and 0x19 respectively.
Doing that conversion during compilation is no longer neccessary since those literals are now natively supported in JS.

Omitting that conversion and outputting as-is could slightly increase the ouput's readability or reveal intention.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[coffeescriptbot]

From @GeoffreyBooth on 2016-09-25 16:52

Yes, this makes sense.

[coffeescriptbot]

From @JimPanic on 2016-09-26 11:08

I submitted a PR to the 2 branch in the official repository. Feedback much appreciated!