Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Support nyc report --check-coverage #984

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 3, 2019

Conversation

isaacs
Copy link
Collaborator

@isaacs isaacs commented Feb 2, 2019

No description provided.

@isaacs isaacs requested review from bcoe and coreyfarrell February 2, 2019 00:33
@isaacs
Copy link
Collaborator Author

isaacs commented Feb 2, 2019

(force-pushed to fix lint error)

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 2, 2019

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 96.399% when pulling 85e61ed on isaacs:report-and-check into 29e6f5e on istanbuljs:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 96.399% when pulling 8a30a52 on isaacs:report-and-check into 29e6f5e on istanbuljs:master.

@isaacs
Copy link
Collaborator Author

isaacs commented Feb 3, 2019

So does 2 approvals means it's cool for me to land this? I just realized I have write access on this org, but I don't wanna mess up any process.

@coreyfarrell coreyfarrell merged commit dd48410 into istanbuljs:master Feb 3, 2019
@coreyfarrell
Copy link
Member

So does 2 approvals means it's cool for me to land this? I just realized I have write access on this org, but I don't wanna mess up any process.

I just did it. For this PR a 'squash and merge' with the provided commit message was fine (you followed conventional-commit). I have no objection if you use 'squash and merge' for approved non-breaking changes as long as you make sure the commit message follows conventional-commit rules. For breaking changes I'd prefer that we have a chance to decide when those get landed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants