-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Subnet Routing Failover #54
Comments
I'll give it a shot :) |
So it doesn't look like there's a way to do this via the builtin API, other than enabling / disabling routes in a certain order to determine which is primary. As of now, it looks like if you just enable the route on two nodes it "just works" -- Do you need to be able to select which is primary? |
I can also add an indicator of route failover if that would be beneficial |
Yes correctly :) but dont know i that is possible i am not using the routing failover at the moment.
I think that would help. |
It's technically possible -- I'll see what I can do! I'm working on rewriting how I manage routes so once that's done I"ll work on this |
I've added some preliminary work into v0.6.0 |
I have installed the :testing version. Now all Routes are duplicated. One normal Route and one as "Failover Pair" |
Interesting... |
Can you give examples of the failover ranges you are using? Lines 307 to 332 in fc5908f
|
I need to figure out a better way to do this. |
Perfect! |
btw don't use testing for long -- I am always pushing updates to it so things will break all the time. Or just use this current release of testing until I push it to main :) |
Closing -- This will be in main in about 1.5 hours (multiarch builds take a while). Please use the main branch after it's available. Thanks! |
Is it planned to add the subnet failover function to the webui?
juanfont/headscale#1024
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: