Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds check so deferred input values #32706

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 27, 2023
Merged

Adds check so deferred input values #32706

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 27, 2023

Conversation

nam054
Copy link
Contributor

@nam054 nam054 commented Jul 26, 2023

Description

Adds check so deferred input values in CRUD lifecycle mode plans successfully.

Relations

Closes #32118

References

Output from Acceptance Testing

> make testacc TESTS=TestAccLambdaInvocation_ PKG=lambda
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/lambda/... -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run='TestAccLambdaInvocation_'  -timeout 180m
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaInvocation_terraformKey (57.31s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaInvocation_lifecycle_scopeCRUDUpdateInput (57.78s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaInvocation_complex (68.52s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaInvocation_basic (74.43s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaInvocation_lifecycle_scopeCreateOnlyToCRUD (76.12s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaInvocation_lifecycle_scopeCRUDCreate (92.90s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaInvocation_lifecycle_scopeCreateOnlyUpdateInput (98.90s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaInvocation_triggers (111.09s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaInvocation_lifecycle_scopeCRUDDestroy (111.61s)
PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/lambda     114.727s

...

@github-actions
Copy link

Community Note

Voting for Prioritization

  • Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize this pull request.
  • Please see our prioritization guide for information on how we prioritize.
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.

For Submitters

  • Review the contribution guide relating to the type of change you are making to ensure all of the necessary steps have been taken.
  • For new resources and data sources, use skaff to generate scaffolding with comments detailing common expectations.
  • Whether or not the branch has been rebased will not impact prioritization, but doing so is always a welcome surprise.

@github-actions github-actions bot added size/XS Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. service/lambda Issues and PRs that pertain to the lambda service. prioritized Part of the maintainer teams immediate focus. To be addressed within the current quarter. labels Jul 26, 2023
@nam054 nam054 marked this pull request as ready for review July 26, 2023 20:50
Copy link
Contributor

@johnsonaj johnsonaj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀

$ make testacc TESTS=TestAccLambdaInvocation_ PKG=lambda

==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/lambda/... -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run='TestAccLambdaInvocation_'  -timeout 180m
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaInvocation_qualifier (36.27s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaInvocation_lifecycle_scopeCRUDCreate (55.30s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaInvocation_complex (61.11s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaInvocation_lifecycle_scopeCRUDUpdateInput (62.61s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaInvocation_basic (66.67s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaInvocation_triggers (74.28s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaInvocation_terraformKey (78.90s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaInvocation_lifecycle_scopeCreateOnlyToCRUD (90.03s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaInvocation_lifecycle_scopeCreateOnlyUpdateInput (98.13s)
--- PASS: TestAccLambdaInvocation_lifecycle_scopeCRUDDestroy (104.76s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/lambda	107.757s

@johnsonaj
Copy link
Contributor

you can use the timestamp() function as a payload value to simulate (known after apply)

@nam054 nam054 merged commit beede2b into main Jul 27, 2023
@nam054 nam054 deleted the b-validate-plan-fail branch July 27, 2023 17:50
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v5.10.0 milestone Jul 27, 2023
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

This functionality has been released in v5.10.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 27, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
prioritized Part of the maintainer teams immediate focus. To be addressed within the current quarter. service/lambda Issues and PRs that pertain to the lambda service. size/XS Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: aws_lambda_invocation plan fails for deferred input values in CRUD lifecycle mode
2 participants