-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 987
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add history_blocks to manifest #5032
Conversation
482e205
to
9316ca1
Compare
#[derive(Debug, Deserialize)] | ||
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")] | ||
pub struct IndexerHints { | ||
pub history_blocks: Option<BlockNumber>, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@leoyvens how does this look? If we have ongoing pruning do we need to the prune
hint to do the manual pruning?
indexingHints:
prune:
historyBlocks: 100
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
let manifest = resolve_manifest(YAML, SPEC_VERSION_0_0_4).await; | ||
|
||
assert_eq!("Qmmanifest", manifest.id.as_str()); | ||
assert!(manifest.indexer_hints.unwrap().prune.is_some()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand this test - what is this trying to ensure?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh i used that test to test out the indexer_hints parsing is working properly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will remove it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
its was removed already. merging
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a comment what the intent of the test was would have been fine, too - it was just a bit confusing.
Closes #3667