You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When this project was put together, CSS properties were defined in the specs as either animatable as a specific type, or not animatable at all. The advent of the Web Animations API has introduced a change in specs, where "Animatable: no" has been replaced with "Animation type: discrete".
That means this project's definition of "animatable" should actually be "interpolatable", because discrete values are still technically animatable (and the WAAPI defines a distinction between "discrete animation" and "no animation").
This should just be a matter of documentation for now. but it might be worth having different definitions for discrete values (e.g. align-items) vs properties that should never be animated (e.g. display).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When this project was put together, CSS properties were defined in the specs as either animatable as a specific type, or not animatable at all. The advent of the Web Animations API has introduced a change in specs, where "Animatable: no" has been replaced with "Animation type: discrete".
That means this project's definition of "animatable" should actually be "interpolatable", because discrete values are still technically animatable (and the WAAPI defines a distinction between "discrete animation" and "no animation").
This should just be a matter of documentation for now. but it might be worth having different definitions for discrete values (e.g.
align-items
) vs properties that should never be animated (e.g.display
).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: