Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wireguard backend has duplicate peers #1421

Closed
txomon opened this issue Mar 18, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Wireguard backend has duplicate peers #1421

txomon opened this issue Mar 18, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@txomon
Copy link
Contributor

txomon commented Mar 18, 2021

Expected Behavior

Running wg should show one link per node

Current Behavior

Running wg may show more than one link per node

Possible Solution

Probably check for existing peers before adding a new one

Steps to Reproduce (for bugs)

Set up several nodes with wireguard backend, check all of them

Context

Thankfully it doesn't break functionality so it's not such a big problem, but maybe something could be done

Your Environment

  • Flannel version: master
  • Backend used (e.g. vxlan or udp): wireguard
  • Etcd version: N/A
  • Kubernetes version (if used): 1.20
  • Operating System and version: arch + k3s
  • Link to your project (optional): None
@nabam
Copy link

nabam commented Mar 7, 2022

I think I experience exactly the same issue here k3s-io/k3s#5216. Flannel is a bit outdated in the k3s version that I'm running, not sure if it's fixed in later releases of flannel.

@andreek
Copy link
Contributor

andreek commented Jun 8, 2022

This issue is solved by #1230.

Can be closed.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 25, 2023

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Jan 25, 2023
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Feb 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants