Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Cannot read directory" error after upgrading beyond 0.8.42 #816

Closed
evanleck opened this issue Feb 16, 2021 · 11 comments
Closed

"Cannot read directory" error after upgrading beyond 0.8.42 #816

evanleck opened this issue Feb 16, 2021 · 11 comments

Comments

@evanleck
Copy link

The full error is:

 > error: Cannot read directory "node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected]/node_modules/esbuild/bin/esbuild": not a directory

I use pnpm and its npx equivalent pnpx to execute esbuild like this:

pnpx esbuild  --metafile=tmp/manifest.json --public-path=/assets --bundle --format=esm --splitting --target=es2017 --charset=utf8 '--define:process.env.NODE_ENV="development"' --outdir=public/assets {big mess of scripts}

This error occurs starting with 0.8.43 and is still happening with 0.8.46.

@adamhp
Copy link

adamhp commented Feb 16, 2021

@evanleck
Assuming you're on some sort of Unix-based filesystem, what happens if you:

ls -la node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected]/node_modules/esbuild/bin/

In other words, verify your assumption that node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected]/node_modules/esbuild/bin actually exists?

@evanleck
Copy link
Author

@adamhp good call, it exists and there's an executable in that directory. The error is complaining that bin/esbuild is not a directory, however, which is true but I'm unsure why it should be a directory.

# 0.8.42
ls -la node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected]/node_modules/esbuild/bin
.rwxr-xr-x@ 7.3M evan 16 Feb  9:31 esbuild

# 0.8.46
ls -la node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected]/node_modules/esbuild/bin 
.rwxr-xr-x@ 7.4M evan 16 Feb 10:12 esbuild

@adamhp
Copy link

adamhp commented Feb 16, 2021

I'd give the classic Microsoft fix a shot:

rm -rf node_modules
pnpm install

Or whatever the equivalent of a reinstall node_modules is—I'm not super familiar with pnpm.

I just did the following with no issues, so I doubt it is related to the latest version.

npm install -g pnpm
pnpx esbuild --version

Edit:
May have something to do with where the lockfile points too. Check out the contents of node_modules/.pnpm/lock.yaml and make sure that looks right.

dependencies:
  esbuild: 0.8.46
lockfileVersion: 5.2
packages:
  /esbuild/0.8.46:
    dev: false
    hasBin: true
    requiresBuild: true
    resolution:
      integrity: sha512-xck9sXNCNmjDHCCfxTCyhKTiFuEBweh+IDAhMLOJI990v1Fzii6MyIkT1LbkvjgoVgPX2SK1kpi5eZVGNrl8yg==
specifiers:
  esbuild: ^0.8.46

@evanleck
Copy link
Author

@adamhp yup, I already tried running rm -rf node_modules ~/.pnpm-store and re-running pnpm install without luck. Not sure about the lock file, best I can tell it's identical to pnpm-lock.yaml. Could you elaborate on "where the lockfile points too" ?

@evanw
Copy link
Owner

evanw commented Feb 17, 2021

The change in 0.8.43 that seems the most suspicious is the change to follow multiple levels of symlinks. Do you have instructions that would let me reproduce this? I tried using a similar command but it works for me. Also, what operating system are you using?

@evanleck
Copy link
Author

@evanw I know pnpm uses hard links to its shared store so maybe something funky's happening there. I'm on Fedora 33 kernel 5.10.15-200.fc33.x86_64 with Node.js version 14.15.5, pnpm 5.17.2, and npm 7.5.4.

Let me see if I can't get you a standalone reproduction, right now I can only reproduce it in a private repository.

@evanleck
Copy link
Author

@evanw mind if I shoot you an email with the code that's producing the error? It's not open source so I'd rather not share it publicly but it's not exactly top secret either haha

@evanw
Copy link
Owner

evanw commented Feb 18, 2021

mind if I shoot you an email with the code that's producing the error?

Sure thing. Thanks for offering.

@evanw
Copy link
Owner

evanw commented Feb 18, 2021

Just had time to look into this. Looks like this was actually due to the NODE_PATH change, not the symlinks change. pnpx inserts a path into NODE_PATH that is actually a file, not a directory. Now that esbuild respects NODE_PATH it hits an error when it tries to load a file as a directory. Here's the full contents of NODE_PATH when I build that code:

/Users/evan/Downloads/esbuild-816/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected]/node_modules/esbuild/bin/esbuild/node_modules
/Users/evan/Downloads/esbuild-816/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected]/node_modules/esbuild/bin/node_modules
/Users/evan/Downloads/esbuild-816/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected]/node_modules/esbuild/node_modules
/Users/evan/Downloads/esbuild-816/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected]/node_modules
/Users/evan/Downloads/esbuild-816/node_modules/.pnpm/node_modules
/Users/evan/Downloads/esbuild-816/node_modules
/Users/evan/Downloads/node_modules
/Users/evan/node_modules
/Users/node_modules
/node_modules
/Users/evan/Downloads/esbuild-816/node_modules/esbuild/bin/esbuild/node_modules
/Users/evan/Downloads/esbuild-816/node_modules/esbuild/bin/node_modules
/Users/evan/Downloads/esbuild-816/node_modules/esbuild/node_modules

The problematic path is /Users/evan/Downloads/esbuild-816/node_modules/esbuild/bin/esbuild/node_modules, which has a file as a parent directory. This is why this is failing. Kind of seems like a bug in pnpx to me.

A workaround for now could be to invoke esbuild directly instead of going through pnpx:

-pnpx esbuild $(ESBUILD_OPTIONS)
+./node_modules/esbuild/bin/esbuild $(ESBUILD_OPTIONS)

This bypasses the shim file in node_modules/.bin/esbuild that pnpm adds which has the problematic NODE_PATH value.

@evanleck
Copy link
Author

@evanw thanks so much for figuring that out and working around it! I've filed an issue with pnpm as well and am referencing your comment above. pnpm/pnpm#3156

@richard-stafflink
Copy link

@evanw thanks so much for this - removing the NODE_PATH env var fixed it for me

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants