Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EIP-4844 Implementers' Call #21 #760

Closed
timbeiko opened this issue Apr 18, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

EIP-4844 Implementers' Call #21 #760

timbeiko opened this issue Apr 18, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@qizhou
Copy link

qizhou commented Apr 19, 2023

I wrote a simple EVM assembly code to support DATAHASH (0x49) opcode and a solidity library to use the assembly https://github.com/ethstorage/eip4844-blob-hash-getter. I hope that this may reduce the efforts of developers to experiment with BLOBs.

Tested the code by setting up an EIP-4844 devnet following https://hackmd.io/@jimmygchen/H1XUtBIfn from lighthouse. Both the devnet and contract code work as expected as the 4844's spec.

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Nice! thanks for sharing!

@roberto-bayardo
Copy link

Another (tiny) spec update from Etan: ethereum/EIPs#6503

@roberto-bayardo
Copy link

And lastly I believe Etan is out today but maybe we could discuss his question here about whether we should use opaque signature format (the format expected by the crypto libraries) in the SSZ rather than splitting out v,r,s

https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-6493-ssz-transaction-signature-scheme/13050/4?u=roberto-bayardo

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

timbeiko commented May 3, 2023

Closed in favour of #772

@timbeiko timbeiko closed this as completed May 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants