-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 989
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
eip7251: Bugfix and more withdrawal tests #3979
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for this! It looks really good.
- The name
processed_partial_withdrawals_count
makes sense 👍 - Good catch on the bug, the fix looks correct to me.
- The new tests are nice. I see no issues here, just a few questions.
tests/core/pyspec/eth2spec/test/electra/block_processing/test_process_withdrawals.py
Show resolved
Hide resolved
tests/core/pyspec/eth2spec/test/electra/block_processing/test_process_withdrawals.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
tests/core/pyspec/eth2spec/test/electra/block_processing/test_process_withdrawals.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The idea looks good to me
balance = state.balances[validator_index] | ||
# [Modified in Electra:EIP7251] | ||
partially_withdrawn_balance = sum( | ||
withdrawal.amount for withdrawal in withdrawals if withdrawal.validator_index == validator_index) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alternatively, it could iterate over withdrawals[:effective_partial_withdrawals_count]
which contains partial withdrawals included during the current run. In cases when there are no withdrawal requests eligible for processing this computation will be a noop. But we can also leave the existing computation in the spec for simplicity and defer possible optimisation to the implementations
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is effective_partial_withdrawals_count
? I cannot find its definition.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ppopth I think he meant processed_partial_withdrawals_count
, the newly renamed variable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
effective_partial_withdrawals_count = len(withdrawals)
computed before the sweep. processed_partial_withdrawals_count
may be greater than that number due to skipped partial withdrawals
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That makes sense then.
tests/core/pyspec/eth2spec/test/electra/block_processing/test_process_withdrawals.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Justin Traglia <[email protected]>
Follow up to #3943 with more withdrawal tests and yet another bugfix.
The PR does also proposes to rename
partial_withdrawals_count
toprocessed_partial_withdrawals_count
and withdrawals test helper refactor.The fix
The balance withdrawn upon request, i.e. by processing a pending partial withdrawal, wasn’t taken into account for the sweep. Potential outcome is a validator being considered partially withdrawable while it has no excess balance and effectively is not partially withdrawable.
The proposed fix is simply to check if validator index is already presented in the withdrawals and deduct the already withdrawn balance from the balance considered by the sweep.