Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

to identify actions and evaluate accuracy by using console test (AEGHB-742) #189

Open
s129729 opened this issue Jul 18, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

Comments

@s129729
Copy link

s129729 commented Jul 18, 2024

I'd like to identify a specific action and evaluate accuracy by using console test.
So, I collected the CSI data, for example, as the target of jump, sended the data, and click the csi start button while jumping for evaluating accuracy.
But the recognition result shows only none/someone or move/static, then I can't evaluate identifing the action.
Doesn't it show the result of jump or not when sending jump data? I'd like to know if it is working correctly or not.

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title to identify actions and evaluate accuracy by using console test to identify actions and evaluate accuracy by using console test (AEGHB-742) Jul 18, 2024
@MacChu0315-Espressif
Copy link

The present algorithm only provides the detection of whether an action occurs in the presence or absence of a person. The functionality you mentioned above is used to annotate actions to help you build your own dataset.

@s129729
Copy link
Author

s129729 commented Jul 21, 2024

Thank you for your reply.
I understand the functionality of "5.5 Collect CSI data for a specific action"
Sorry, still I can't understand the fuctionality of "5.6 Use collected data to identify actions and evaluate accuracy".
Can't I use this for detecting a specific action?

@MacChu0315-Espressif
Copy link

Hello, I have confirmed that the function mentioned in section 5.6 has been removed, but the UI and readme have not been changed in time. Sorry for the inconvenience caused to you.

@MacChu0315-Espressif
Copy link

We will fix this later, thank you!

@tempecks
Copy link

tempecks commented Jul 24, 2024

Is it difficult to provide that function again? I'm very interested in it.
If possible, please tell me the reason for removing it.

@MacChu0315-Espressif
Copy link

This tool was originally used to internally test the detection algorithms used, but it was later found to be less useful than expected, and it was deprecated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants