We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
inMem
need get rid of inMemExec := txc.Doms != nil
inMemExec := txc.Doms != nil
Let's turn inMemExec and isMining into enum with 3 options: Mining/ForkValidation/ApplyBlocks (feel free to propose better naming)
inMemExec
isMining
Mining/ForkValidation/ApplyBlocks
InMem - it's ForkValidation
InMem
ForkValidation
Value let's store inside type Sync struct (we have 3 sync instances) and set to StageState.CurrentSyncCycle.Mode
type Sync struct
StageState.CurrentSyncCycle.Mode
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think we should rename Mining to BlockProduction
Sorry, something went wrong.
oke BlocksProduction ForkValidation ApplyBlocks (or Sync or ?)
BlocksProduction
ApplyBlocks
Sync
?
d515ff6
JkLondon
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
need get rid of
inMemExec := txc.Doms != nil
Let's turn
inMemExec
andisMining
into enum with 3 options:Mining/ForkValidation/ApplyBlocks
(feel free to propose better naming)InMem
- it'sForkValidation
Value let's store inside
type Sync struct
(we have 3 sync instances) and set toStageState.CurrentSyncCycle.Mode
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: