-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
integrations suggested by homeserver #6430
Comments
I think the .well-known proposal by @maxidor is able to handle exactly this |
Indeed, such extensions in it was one of the long term enhancements I had in mind, both for the integration manager and for informing the client about bridges protocols (even tho that should be done at the protocol level I think) |
I assume you're referring to kamax-matrix/matrix-java-sdk#23 or more specifically this proposal This looks very promising and would exactly fullfill my usecase. |
@zeratax yes! |
I guess I can close this then, since it should be mostly addressed with matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals#433 |
I'd recommend keeping it open so it can actually be implemented. |
we ended up implementing this - see matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals#1957 for details on how it works. |
What's the status of this, have maintainers addressed the issue? Is there already a way to change integrations manager server? |
Description
I think it would be very helpful to allow riot to get integrations suggested by the homeserver, like the type of bridges supported by the homeserver. currently always using the matrix.org integrations is kinda annoying when I would like to supply my own alternatives, e.g. my own matrix <-> irc bridge.
Of course you could always ship your own riot-web/mobile/desktop, but in most cases I would assume people would prefer to just use the default. even neater would be, to suggest an entire integration manager so you could point it to e.g. https://github.com/turt2live/matrix-dimension
If nothing is suggested it should still default back to matrix.org integrations.
so something similar to #4081 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: