You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
https://ems.energyflux.rs/
Website has English version
All data for generation/exchanges is available
Also data for hydro pumped storage consumption is available (not available on entso-e)
Note: hydro + hydro pumped is combined here as hydro (on entso-e it has values for output from hydro pumped storage separate)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think keeping entso-e as the source is better as it breaks down the difference between coal and biomass (and run of the river and reservoir hydro) which makes it better from a CO2 emissions standpoint and more future proof as some of the future improvements discussed resolve around just that.
However it might be possible to write a parser that fetch the data from entso-e and then use energyfluxfor.rs just for hydro storage consumption (pumping).
https://ems.energyflux.rs/
Website has English version
All data for generation/exchanges is available
Also data for hydro pumped storage consumption is available (not available on entso-e)
Note: hydro + hydro pumped is combined here as hydro (on entso-e it has values for output from hydro pumped storage separate)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: