You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 15, 2024. It is now read-only.
Probably due to an (undetected ?) shift / reduce conflict in the parser, sequence of expressions are only valid for 2 expressions. You can reproduce the issue with the following kitty-lang sample :
1; 2; 3
This will raise a ParseError
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have some idea to address this nicely like introducing a effect system block imperative where you can do local mutation and statement. But I didn't dig the problem too much.
Before any step, I prefer to add a Harley Mindler like type system and after add statement and mutation after.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Probably due to an (undetected ?) shift / reduce conflict in the parser, sequence of expressions are only valid for 2 expressions. You can reproduce the issue with the following kitty-lang sample :
This will raise a ParseError
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: