Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider switching to specific verify methods from VerifyMembership/VerifyNonMembership #1177

Open
AdityaSripal opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Consider switching to specific verify methods from VerifyMembership/VerifyNonMembership #1177

AdityaSripal opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
feat/eureka v2 TAO specification needs discussion

Comments

@AdityaSripal
Copy link
Member

We could optionally have the client expose: verifySend, verifyAck, and verifyTimeout instead of verifyMembership and verifyNonmembership.

I personally do not like this approach since it breaks the client layer and I also don't think it unlocks any new functionality.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feat/eureka v2 TAO specification needs discussion
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@AdityaSripal