We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For instance:
# open QCheck;; # let arb = pair small_int (always 0);; val arb : (int * int) QCheck.arbitrary = {gen = <fun>; print = None; small = None; shrink = Some <fun>; collect = None; stats = []}
We could have the printer print (n, <no-printer>)? This could still be useful.
(n, <no-printer>)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I noticed the behavior while providing printers for #181
Sorry, something went wrong.
What I propose is very similar to what you did for shrinkers:
let quad = ... ~shrink:(Shrink.quad (_opt_or a.shrink Shrink.nil) (_opt_or b.shrink Shrink.nil) (_opt_or c.shrink Shrink.nil) (_opt_or d.shrink Shrink.nil)) ...
You know, that makes a lot of sense. Good idea 👍
No branches or pull requests
For instance:
We could have the printer print
(n, <no-printer>)
? This could still be useful.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: