035 nov 16 vendors table svg #251
Conversation
…-popups-or-anything-that-readswrites-the-data-fromto-the-backend
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to several components within the codebase, primarily focusing on the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
Clients/src/presentation/components/Table/WithPlaceholder/index.tsx (1)
177-179: Consider text improvements and accessibilityA few suggestions to enhance the empty state message:
- Consider moving the text to a translations file for internationalization
- Add aria-label to the container for better screen reader support
- Consider using theme typography variants instead of hardcoded font size and color
- <Typography sx={{ fontSize: "13px", color: "#475467" }}> - There is currently no data in this table. - </Typography> + <Typography + variant="body2" + color="text.secondary" + aria-label="Empty table message" + > + {t('table.noData')} + </Typography>Clients/src/presentation/components/Modals/NewVendor/index.tsx (2)
Line range hint
156-169: Fix incorrect field update in projectId handlerThe onChange handler for projectId is updating the wrong field:
- It updates
risks.projectNamewhich doesn't exist in the state- It should update
vendorDetails.projectId<Select items={[ { _id: 1, name: "Chatbot AI" }, { _id: 2, name: "Marketing AI" }, { _id: 3, name: "Compliance AI" }, ]} label="Project name" placeholder="Select project" value={values.vendorDetails.projectId} onChange={(e) => - handleOnChange("risks", "projectName", e.target.value) + handleOnChange("vendorDetails", "projectId", Number(e.target.value)) } sx={{ width: 220 }} />
Line range hint
203-225: Standardize ID types in Select componentsThere's inconsistency in how IDs are handled across Select components:
- Some use string IDs: reviewStatus ("Under Review", "Completed", "Failed")
- Some use number IDs: projectId (1, 2, 3)
- Some use descriptive string IDs: riskStatus ("Active", "Under review", "Not active")
This inconsistency could lead to type mismatches and make the code harder to maintain.
Standardize by using numeric IDs consistently:
// reviewStatus Select items={[ - { _id: "Under Review", name: "Under Review" }, - { _id: "Completed", name: "Completed" }, - { _id: "Failed", name: "Failed" }, + { _id: 1, name: "Under Review" }, + { _id: 2, name: "Completed" }, + { _id: 3, name: "Failed" }, ]} // riskStatus Select items={[ - { _id: "Active", name: "Active" }, - { _id: "Under review", name: "Under review" }, - { _id: "Not active", name: "Not active" }, + { _id: 1, name: "Active" }, + { _id: 2, name: "Under review" }, + { _id: 3, name: "Not active" }, ]}Also applies to: 262-266
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Clients/src/presentation/components/Inputs/Field/index.tsx(1 hunks)Clients/src/presentation/components/Modals/NewVendor/index.tsx(18 hunks)Clients/src/presentation/components/Table/WithPlaceholder/index.tsx(2 hunks)Servers/models/vendor.model.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Clients/src/presentation/components/Inputs/Field/index.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (7)
Servers/models/vendor.model.ts (3)
3-3: Well-organized field grouping!
The added comments clearly separate fields based on their UI tabs, improving code organization and maintainability.
Also applies to: 15-15
20-20: Verify riskSeverity integration
The addition of riskSeverity as a number type is consistent with other risk metrics. Please ensure this field is properly handled in related components.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as I have sufficient information about the riskSeverity integration across the codebase.
riskSeverity field is properly integrated
The field is consistently handled across the application:
- Backend: Properly defined in models, controllers, and database operations
- Frontend: Integrated in risk assessment forms with appropriate UI components
- Risk calculation: Used in RiskLevel component to calculate overall risk level (likelihood * riskSeverity)
- API: Documented in swagger.yaml with correct type definition
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for components that might need updates for the new riskSeverity field
rg -A 5 "riskSeverity"
# Look for form handling or risk calculation logic
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = { $$$, riskSeverity: $_.$_, $$$ }'
Length of output: 15319
6-7: Verify field order dependencies
The reordering of fields might impact code that relies on field order. Please ensure there are no serialization/deserialization dependencies.
Also applies to: 11-11, 13-13
✅ Verification successful
Field reordering is safe in this codebase
The verification shows that field order in the Vendor type is not a concern because:
- The model is a TypeScript type, not a TypeORM entity with decorators
- All database operations use explicit field names in SQL queries
- Object mapping in React components accesses properties by name
- No serialization/deserialization code depends on field order
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential serialization/deserialization code that might depend on field order
rg -A 5 "JSON\.(parse|stringify).*Vendor"
# Look for any mapping or transformation logic
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = { $$$: vendor.$$$, $$$: vendor.$$$, $$$ }'
Length of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any direct usage of Vendor model properties in object construction or mapping
rg -A 5 "new Vendor\("
# Look for any TypeORM repository operations or database queries
rg -A 5 "VendorRepository|@Entity\(\)|@Column\("
# Search for any transformation or mapping functions involving Vendor
rg -A 5 "transform.*Vendor|map.*Vendor|convert.*Vendor"
# Look for any serialization related decorators
rg "@Serialize|@Transform|@Type" Servers/models/vendor.model.ts
Length of output: 942
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for TypeORM entity definition and decorators in the vendor model
cat Servers/models/vendor.model.ts
# Look for any database schema migrations
fd -e ts -e js migration
# Search for any database query builders or raw queries involving Vendor
rg -A 5 "createQueryBuilder.*Vendor|SELECT.*FROM.*vendor|INSERT.*INTO.*vendor|UPDATE.*vendor"
Length of output: 5360
Clients/src/presentation/components/Table/WithPlaceholder/index.tsx (3)
27-27: LGTM: Import changes align with requirements
The addition of Typography and switch to SVG format improves both functionality and scalability.
Also applies to: 31-31
165-173: LGTM: Layout improvements enhance visual hierarchy
The switch to grid layout with proper spacing improves the empty state presentation.
Line range hint 134-134: Verify data model changes across the codebase
The change from row.risk to row.risk_status suggests a data model update. Let's ensure this change is consistent across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Change from row.risk to row.risk_status is consistent with data model
The change is verified to be correct and consistent with the codebase:
- The
risk_statusproperty is defined in the Vendor type/interface invendors.data.ts - The property is used consistently in table rendering and database schema
- The old
riskproperty is not used in any vendor-related interfaces or types - The change aligns with the vendor risk status values used throughout the application ("High", "Moderate", "Low")
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old 'risk' property
echo "Checking for old 'risk' property usage..."
rg -l "\.risk[^_]" --type typescript --type javascript
# Search for new 'risk_status' property usage
echo "Checking for new 'risk_status' property usage..."
rg -l "\.risk_status" --type typescript --type javascript
# Check Vendor type definition
echo "Checking Vendor type definition..."
rg -l "interface.*Vendor" --type typescript
Length of output: 558
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old 'risk' property
echo "Checking for old 'risk' property usage..."
rg -l "\.risk[^_]"
# Search for new 'risk_status' property usage
echo "Checking for new 'risk_status' property usage..."
rg -l "\.risk_status"
# Check for type definitions containing risk or risk_status
echo "Checking type definitions..."
rg "type|interface.*\{.*risk" -A 5
Length of output: 421808
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for risk_status usage in TypeScript files
echo "Checking for risk_status usage..."
rg -p "risk_status" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for risk property usage in TypeScript files
echo "Checking for risk property usage..."
rg -p "\.risk[^_]" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for Vendor interface/type definitions
echo "Checking Vendor type definitions..."
rg -p "type\s+Vendor|interface\s+Vendor" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 469
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for risk_status usage
echo "Checking for risk_status usage..."
rg "risk_status"
# Search for risk property usage
echo "Checking for risk property usage..."
rg "\.risk[^_]"
# Search for Vendor type definitions
echo "Checking Vendor type definitions..."
rg "type\s+Vendor|interface\s+Vendor"
Length of output: 8897
Clients/src/presentation/components/Modals/NewVendor/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint 1-585: Verify type consistency across the codebase
Let's verify that these type changes don't cause issues in other components that might be consuming this data.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the usage of vendor and risk-related types across the codebase.
Type changes in NewVendor component are safe to proceed
The type changes in the NewVendor component are isolated and don't cause any inconsistencies across the codebase because:
- The
VendorDetailsandRisksinterfaces are locally scoped within the component and not exported - The component is imported in only three places:
Clients/src/presentation/pages/Vendors/index.tsxClients/src/presentation/pages/ProjectView/RisksView/index.tsxClients/src/presentation/components/IconButton/index.tsx
These importing components only interact with the NewVendor component through its public props interface (AddNewVendorProps), which remains unchanged.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for components that might be affected by the type changes
# Check for components using vendor-related types
echo "Checking for components using VendorDetails or Risks interfaces..."
rg -l "VendorDetails|Risks" --type typescript
# Check for components consuming vendor data
echo "Checking for components consuming vendor data..."
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = $$$; // Look for vendor-related state or props
const { vendorDetails, risks } = $_;'
Length of output: 452
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to search for vendor-related types and usages
# Search for files containing VendorDetails or Risks
echo "Searching for files with vendor-related types..."
rg -l "VendorDetails|Risks"
# Search for any vendor-related state management or props
echo -e "\nSearching for vendor data usage..."
rg -A 2 "vendorDetails|risks"
# Look for any imports from this component
echo -e "\nSearching for imports of NewVendor component..."
rg -l "import.*NewVendor"
Length of output: 29556
| <Select // riskLevel | ||
| items={[ | ||
| { _id: 1, name: "High" }, | ||
| { _id: 2, name: "Moderate" }, | ||
| { _id: 3, name: "Low" }, | ||
| { _id: "Very high risk", name: "Very high risk" }, | ||
| { _id: "High risk", name: "High risk" }, | ||
| { _id: "Medium risk", name: "Medium risk" }, | ||
| { _id: "Low risk", name: "Low risk" }, | ||
| { _id: "Very low risk", name: "Very low risk" }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Standardize risk level IDs to match other numeric fields
The risk level Select component uses string IDs while the state expects numeric values. This inconsistency could cause type mismatches.
<Select
items={[
- { _id: "Very high risk", name: "Very high risk" },
- { _id: "High risk", name: "High risk" },
- { _id: "Medium risk", name: "Medium risk" },
- { _id: "Low risk", name: "Low risk" },
- { _id: "Very low risk", name: "Very low risk" },
+ { _id: 1, name: "Very high risk" },
+ { _id: 2, name: "High risk" },
+ { _id: 3, name: "Medium risk" },
+ { _id: 4, name: "Low risk" },
+ { _id: 5, name: "Very low risk" },
]}
onChange={(e) => handleOnChange("risks", "riskLevel", Number(e.target.value))}
/>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <Select // riskLevel | |
| items={[ | |
| { _id: 1, name: "High" }, | |
| { _id: 2, name: "Moderate" }, | |
| { _id: 3, name: "Low" }, | |
| { _id: "Very high risk", name: "Very high risk" }, | |
| { _id: "High risk", name: "High risk" }, | |
| { _id: "Medium risk", name: "Medium risk" }, | |
| { _id: "Low risk", name: "Low risk" }, | |
| { _id: "Very low risk", name: "Very low risk" }, | |
| <Select // riskLevel | |
| items={[ | |
| { _id: 1, name: "Very high risk" }, | |
| { _id: 2, name: "High risk" }, | |
| { _id: 3, name: "Medium risk" }, | |
| { _id: 4, name: "Low risk" }, | |
| { _id: 5, name: "Very low risk" }, |
| projectId: 0, | ||
| vendorProvides: "", | ||
| vendorContactPerson: "", | ||
| reviewResult: "", | ||
| reviewStatus: "0", | ||
| reviewer: "0", | ||
| riskStatus: "0", | ||
| reviewResult: "", | ||
| riskStatus: 0, | ||
| assignee: 0, | ||
| reviewDate: "", | ||
| assignee: "0", | ||
| }, | ||
| risks: { | ||
| riskDescription: "", | ||
| impactDescription: "", | ||
| projectName: "0", | ||
| probability: "0", | ||
| impact: "0", | ||
| actionOwner: "0", | ||
| riskSeverity: "0", | ||
| likelihood: "0", | ||
| riskLevel: "0", | ||
| impact: 0, | ||
| probability: 0, | ||
| actionOwner: 0, | ||
| riskSeverity: 0, | ||
| likelihood: 0, | ||
| riskLevel: 0, | ||
| actionPlan: "", | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update interfaces to match implementation
The interface definitions don't match the actual state implementation, which could lead to type-safety issues:
- Interface
VendorDetailsstill showsprojectVendorIsConnectedToas string while the state usesprojectIdas number - Interface
RisksshowsprojectNameas string while it's not used in the state - Several fields in both interfaces are defined as string but initialized as numbers
Update the interfaces to match the implementation:
interface VendorDetails {
vendorName: string;
- projectVendorIsConnectedTo: string;
+ projectId: number;
vendorProvides: string;
website: string;
vendorContactPerson: string;
reviewResult: string;
- reviewStatus: string;
+ reviewStatus: string; // Keep as string since Select uses string IDs
- reviewer: string;
+ reviewer: string; // Keep as string since Select uses string IDs
- riskStatus: string;
+ riskStatus: number;
+ assignee: number;
reviewDate: string;
}
interface Risks {
riskDescription: string;
impactDescription: string;
- projectName: string;
- probability: string;
+ probability: number;
- impact: string;
+ impact: number;
- actionOwner: string;
+ actionOwner: number;
- riskSeverity: string;
+ riskSeverity: number;
- likelihood: string;
+ likelihood: number;
- riskLevel: string;
+ riskLevel: number;
+ actionPlan: string;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| projectId: 0, | |
| vendorProvides: "", | |
| vendorContactPerson: "", | |
| reviewResult: "", | |
| reviewStatus: "0", | |
| reviewer: "0", | |
| riskStatus: "0", | |
| reviewResult: "", | |
| riskStatus: 0, | |
| assignee: 0, | |
| reviewDate: "", | |
| assignee: "0", | |
| }, | |
| risks: { | |
| riskDescription: "", | |
| impactDescription: "", | |
| projectName: "0", | |
| probability: "0", | |
| impact: "0", | |
| actionOwner: "0", | |
| riskSeverity: "0", | |
| likelihood: "0", | |
| riskLevel: "0", | |
| impact: 0, | |
| probability: 0, | |
| actionOwner: 0, | |
| riskSeverity: 0, | |
| likelihood: 0, | |
| riskLevel: 0, | |
| actionPlan: "", | |
| }, | |
| interface VendorDetails { | |
| vendorName: string; | |
| projectId: number; | |
| vendorProvides: string; | |
| website: string; | |
| vendorContactPerson: string; | |
| reviewResult: string; | |
| reviewStatus: string; // Keep as string since Select uses string IDs | |
| reviewer: string; // Keep as string since Select uses string IDs | |
| riskStatus: number; | |
| assignee: number; | |
| reviewDate: string; | |
| } | |
| interface Risks { | |
| riskDescription: string; | |
| impactDescription: string; | |
| probability: number; | |
| impact: number; | |
| actionOwner: number; | |
| riskSeverity: number; | |
| likelihood: number; | |
| riskLevel: number; | |
| actionPlan: string; | |
| } |
MuhammadKhalilzadeh
force-pushed
the
035-nov-16-vendors-table-svg
branch
from
4c8e4ac to
30a7088
Compare
Addressing to close #239
Here's the screenshot:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Fieldcomponent with improved label visibility through adjusted font size.AddNewVendorcomponent to better capture vendor and risk details, including new properties and refined data types.TableWithPlaceholdercomponent with a new grid layout and clearer messaging for empty states.Bug Fixes
TableWithPlaceholderto correctly display risk information.Documentation
Vendortype definition for better understanding.