Implemented ComplianceTracker Page- first section #19
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Clients/src/presentation/components/Table/index.tsx (1)
131-133: Improve accessibility and icon sizing.The code segment correctly renders the status icon within a
TableCell. However, consider the following suggestions:
Use more descriptive
alttext based on the specific status the icon represents. For example, "completed status icon" or "pending status icon". This will improve accessibility for users relying on screen readers.Consider using CSS to set the width of the icon instead of hardcoding it to 20 pixels. This will ensure flexibility and consistency across different icon sizes.
Placeholder icons are acceptable for now.
As mentioned in the PR objectives, the current icons are placeholders and will be updated in the future. The usage of temporary icons is acceptable for the current implementation.
Clients/src/presentation/pages/ComplianceTracker/index.tsx (1)
4-5: Replace Placeholder Icons with Correct AssetsThe icons imported on lines 4-5 are placeholders:
Since you mentioned that the correct icons are yet to be found, remember to update these imports with the appropriate icon assets once they are available.
Would you like assistance in locating or implementing the correct icons?
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- Clients/src/presentation/components/Table/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- Clients/src/presentation/pages/ComplianceTracker/index.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
Clients/src/presentation/pages/ComplianceTracker/index.tsx (2)
197-199: Handle Dropdown Options AppropriatelyCurrently, there's only one
MenuItemin the dropdown, and a comment indicates more options should be added:Ensure the application handles scenarios where there might be no projects or multiple projects. Consider adding placeholder text or disabling the dropdown when no options are available.
Would you like assistance in implementing a dynamic list of projects or handling the empty state gracefully?
268-287: Verify Accordion Data AlignmentBoth accordion panels are rendering the same
complianceDetailsdata:If the panels are intended to display different compliance sections, ensure they are supplied with the appropriate data.
Consider defining separate data structures for each panel or modifying
complianceDetailsto accommodate different datasets.// Example of separate data for panel2 const complianceDetailsPanel2 = { /* ... */ };This will provide clarity and ensure each accordion accurately represents its respective content.
| mr: -20 /* border:"2px, solid" , borderColor:"red"*/, | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid Negative Margins and Remove Commented Code
The mr: -20 negative margin and the commented-out code on lines 166-167 may lead to layout issues and reduce code readability:
Negative margins can cause unintended overlaps and make the layout less responsive.
Apply the following diff to remove the negative margin and commented code:
162 <Container
163 sx={{
164 mt: 1,
165 ml: 15,
166- mr: -20 /* border:"2px, solid" , borderColor:"red"*/,
166+ mr: 0,
167 }}
168 >Consider adjusting the layout using flexible spacing solutions provided by Material-UI's Grid or Flexbox to achieve the desired design without negative margins.
| position: "absolute", | ||
| top: 60, | ||
| right: 0, | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace Absolute Positioning with Flexbox or Grid Layout
The use of absolute positioning on lines 176-179 may cause layout issues, especially on different screen sizes:
Absolute positioning can lead to overlapping content and responsiveness problems.
Consider using Flexbox or Grid to align items:
171 sx={{
172 display: "flex",
173 justifyContent: "flex-end",
174 alignItems: "center",
175 padding: 2,
176- position: "absolute",
177- top: 60,
178- right: 0,
179 }}This adjustment leverages Flexbox to position the elements, ensuring a more responsive and maintainable layout.
| expanded={expanded === id} | ||
| onChange={handleAccordionChange(id)} | ||
| sx={{ | ||
| mt: 18, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use Responsive Units Instead of Hardcoded Pixel Values
Hardcoded pixel values on lines 126, 129, 223, and 231 can affect responsiveness:
Utilize theme spacing and percentage-based widths:
-
Replace
mt: 18andmt: 32with theme spacings: -
Use relative widths for better responsiveness:
This approach ensures the layout adapts to different screen sizes and maintains consistency across the application.
Also applies to: 223-223, 129-129, 231-231
| transform: expanded === id ? "rotate(180deg)" : "rotate(270deg)", | ||
| transition: "transform 0.3s ease", | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the Rotation Degrees of the Expand Icon
The rotation angles for the ExpandMoreIcon on lines 140-142 might not reflect standard accordion behavior:
Typically, the icon rotates from 0deg when collapsed to 180deg when expanded.
Apply the following diff to correct the rotation:
138 sx={{
139 transform: expanded === id ? "rotate(180deg)" : "rotate(0deg)",
140 transition: "transform 0.3s ease",
141 }}This change ensures the expand icon behaves as users expect, enhancing the user experience.
|
@MuhammadKhalilzadeh are we going to use the icons from MUI or will we use the icons from our Style Guide on Figma? |
|
@gorkem-bwl Both of theme, but mainly, we export icons from the Figma design in SVG format in the icons directory. |
|
@melpsh Please upload screenshots your your current looks of the UI. |
|
Hi Mohammad, |
|
Also, there is no button associated with SubControlPane in Figma implementation.
Please let me know which button is responsible for opening the subControl. |
|
@gorkem-bwl Would you please provide more details about how |
When I click on a row on the main table, the corresponding subcontrol pane will be opened. When the mouse is over a row, the background color will change to #FCFCFC |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
Clients/src/App.tsx (3)
15-15: Consider moving data fetching logic to a more appropriate component.The import statement is correct and follows good practices by importing specific named exports. However, importing data directly into
App.tsxmight not be the most scalable approach as the application grows.Consider moving the data fetching logic to the
ComplianceTrackercomponent or a custom hook. This would improve the separation of concerns and make theAppcomponent more maintainable.
26-26: Props are correctly passed, but consider scalability for complex data flows.The
ComplianceTrackercomponent now receivescomplianceMetricsandcomplianceDetailsas props, which is a good practice for component reusability and testability.As the application grows, consider using React Context or a state management library (e.g., Redux) for more complex data flows. This can help avoid prop drilling and make it easier to manage global state.
Line range hint
15-26: Summary: New data flow introduced for ComplianceTrackerThe changes introduce a new data flow for the ComplianceTracker component. While the implementation is correct, consider the following points for future development:
- As the application grows, evaluate whether App.tsx is the best place to manage this data.
- Be mindful of potential prop drilling in deeper component hierarchies.
- Consider using React Context or a state management library for more complex data flows.
These changes lay the groundwork for the ComplianceTracker page implementation mentioned in the PR objectives.
Clients/src/presentation/pages/ComplianceTracker/complianceData.ts (1)
1-5: LGTM! Consider removing the extra empty line.The imports look good and follow the best practice of importing SVG icons as React components. However, you could remove the extra empty line (line 5) for better code organization.
import Checked from "../../assets/icons/check-circle-green.svg"; import Exclamation from "../../assets/icons/alert-circle-orange.svg"; -Clients/src/presentation/components/Table/index.css (1)
Line range hint
1-124: Suggestions for improving CSS structure and maintainabilityWhile reviewing the changes, I noticed a few areas where the overall CSS structure could be improved:
Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of different style blocks. This will make it easier for other developers to understand and maintain the code.
The selectors used are quite specific in some cases. Consider if these styles could be made more reusable by using less specific selectors or by leveraging CSS classes more effectively.
Organize the CSS rules into logical sections (e.g., table header styles, body styles, pagination styles). This will make it easier to find and update specific styles in the future.
Here's an example of how you could start organizing the CSS:
/* Table Header Styles */ .MuiTable-root .MuiTableHead-root .MuiTableCell-root { /* ... */ } /* Table Body Styles */ .MuiTable-root .MuiTableBody-root .MuiTableCell-root { /* ... */ } /* Pagination Styles */ .MuiPaper-root + .MuiPagination-root { /* ... */ } /* Monitor-specific Styles */ .monitors .MuiTable-root .MuiTableHead-root .MuiTableCell-root { /* ... */ }These changes will improve the maintainability and readability of the CSS file, making it easier for the team to work with in the future.
Clients/src/presentation/pages/ComplianceTracker/index.tsx (1)
79-181: LGTM: Well-structured layout with a minor suggestionThe overall layout of the component is well-organized and makes good use of Material-UI components. The project selection dropdown and compliance metrics display are implemented effectively.
Consider adding more options to the project selection dropdown. Currently, it only has one option:
<MenuItem value="ChatBot AI">ChatBot AI</MenuItem> {/* add more dropDown options here */}You might want to replace this with a dynamic list of projects, perhaps passed as a prop or fetched from an API.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (5)
Clients/src/presentation/assets/icons/alert-circle-orange.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgClients/src/presentation/assets/icons/check-circle-green.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgClients/src/presentation/assets/icons/check-circle.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgClients/src/presentation/assets/icons/info-circle.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgClients/src/presentation/assets/icons/x-close.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
Files selected for processing (5)
- Clients/src/App.tsx (2 hunks)
- Clients/src/presentation/components/Table/index.css (1 hunks)
- Clients/src/presentation/components/Table/index.tsx (4 hunks)
- Clients/src/presentation/pages/ComplianceTracker/complianceData.ts (1 hunks)
- Clients/src/presentation/pages/ComplianceTracker/index.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Clients/src/presentation/components/Table/index.tsx
Additional comments not posted (5)
Clients/src/presentation/pages/ComplianceTracker/complianceData.ts (1)
25-87: Enhance type safety and data consistency incomplianceDetails.The
complianceDetailsobject is well-structured, but there are a few areas for improvement:
- Add type definitions to enhance type safety.
- Remove redundant
idproperties in thedataarrays.- Ensure consistency in representing completion percentages.
Here's a suggested refactoring:
import { ReactComponent as SvgIcon } from 'react-native-svg'; type Column = { id: string; name: string; }; type RowData = { data: string; }; type Row = { id: number; icon: React.FC<React.SVGProps<SVGSVGElement>>; data: RowData[]; }; type ComplianceDetails = { cols: Column[]; rows: Row[]; }; export const complianceDetails: ComplianceDetails = { cols: [ { id: "icon", name: "" }, { id: "CONTROLS", name: "CONTROLS" }, { id: "OWNER", name: "OWNER" }, { id: "SUBCONTROLS", name: "SUBCONTROLS" }, { id: "COMPLETION", name: "COMPLETION" }, ], rows: [ { id: 1, icon: Checked, data: [ { data: "AIAct-016: Compliance with High-Risk AI System Requirements" }, { data: "Rachelle Swing" }, { data: "5 (2 left)" }, { data: "45%" }, ], }, // ... other rows ], };This refactoring:
- Adds type definitions for better type safety.
- Removes redundant
idproperties in thedataarrays.- Ensures all completion percentages are consistently represented as strings with a "%" symbol.
To ensure consistency in completion percentages, you can run the following script:
This will help identify any inconsistencies in how completion percentages are represented.
Verification successful
Completion percentage formats are consistent in
complianceDetails.The verification confirms that all completion percentages are consistently represented with a "%" symbol. No further action is required regarding this aspect.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for inconsistent completion percentage formats in complianceDetails rg --type typescript 'id: "4", data:' Clients/src/presentation/pages/ComplianceTracker/complianceData.tsLength of output: 141
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for inconsistent completion percentage formats in complianceDetails by searching .ts files rg 'id: "4", data:' --glob '*.ts' Clients/src/presentation/pages/ComplianceTracker/complianceData.tsLength of output: 246
Clients/src/presentation/components/Table/index.css (1)
48-50: Clarify the reason for removing table cell paddingThe padding for table body cells has been commented out. While this change might be intentional to match specific design requirements, it's important to ensure that the table's appearance remains consistent and readable.
Could you please clarify the reason for removing this padding? Also, it would be helpful to verify that the table's appearance in the ComplianceTracker page matches the intended design without this padding.
To help verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script to check for any other padding rules that might be applied to these table cells:
This will help ensure that the table cells still have appropriate spacing, even with this rule commented out.
Clients/src/presentation/pages/ComplianceTracker/index.tsx (3)
21-77: LGTM: Well-structured state management and helper functionsThe state management using
useStatehooks and the helper functions for handling state changes are well-implemented. TherenderAccordionfunction is a good approach for creating reusable accordion sections.
214-214: LGTM: Correct component exportThe default export of the
Compliancecomponent is correct and consistent with the component name change mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
182-209: LGTM: Clean accordion implementation with a queryThe accordion implementation using the
renderAccordionfunction is clean and reusable. The use ofBasicTablefor displaying compliance details seems appropriate.There's a commented-out
SubControlcomponent:{/* <SubControl /> */}Is this component intended to be implemented in the future? If so, consider adding a TODO comment explaining its purpose and when it should be uncommented.
To verify the existence and implementation of the
SubControlcomponent, you can run the following script:This will help determine if the
SubControlcomponent exists elsewhere in the codebase and if it's being used in other places.
| export const complianceMetrics = [ | ||
| { | ||
| name: "Compliance Status", | ||
| amount: "15%", | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| name: "Total number of controls", | ||
| amount: "184", | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| name: "Implemented controls", | ||
| amount: "31", | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| name: "Auditor completed", | ||
| amount: "17", | ||
| }, | ||
| ]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding type definitions and using consistent data types.
The complianceMetrics array structure is clear and easy to understand. However, to improve type safety and consistency, consider the following suggestions:
- Add a type definition for the metrics.
- Use consistent data types for the "amount" property (either all numbers or all strings).
Here's an example of how you could refactor this:
type ComplianceMetric = {
name: string;
amount: number | string; // Use number for counts, string for percentages
};
export const complianceMetrics: ComplianceMetric[] = [
{
name: "Compliance Status",
amount: "15%",
},
{
name: "Total number of controls",
amount: 184,
},
{
name: "Implemented controls",
amount: 31,
},
{
name: "Auditor completed",
amount: 17,
},
];This refactoring will improve type safety and make the code more maintainable.
| SelectChangeEvent, | ||
| } from "@mui/material"; | ||
|
|
||
| const Compliance = ({ complianceMetrics, complianceDetails }: any) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using TypeScript interfaces for props
The component is using any type for its props, which reduces type safety. Consider defining proper interfaces for complianceMetrics and complianceDetails to improve type checking and code readability.
Here's an example of how you could define the interfaces:
interface ComplianceMetric {
name: string;
amount: string | number;
}
interface ComplianceDetail {
// Define the structure of complianceDetails here
}
interface ComplianceProps {
complianceMetrics: ComplianceMetric[];
complianceDetails: ComplianceDetail[];
}
const Compliance = ({ complianceMetrics, complianceDetails }: ComplianceProps) => {
// ...
}
|
@gorkemcetin We'll update the data types once we finalize the structure of the data received from the backend. @MuhammadKhalilzadeh, kindly confirm this pull request if you've already completed your review. Thanks for your attention! |
Thank you. I'll work with @Mertcanboyar tomorrow to make sure we finalize the data structure very soon. |
I couldn't find the correct icons for the accordion table, so I used placeholder icons for now. I will update them later once I find the correct ones.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Style