Feat/fe/refactor/input #1174
Feat/fe/refactor/input #1174
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes several updates across multiple files in the client project. Key changes involve updating the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Warning Rate limit exceeded@ajhollid has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
Client/package.json (1)
Line range hint
19-23: Version mismatch making me nervous! 😰Your MUI packages are like a mixed plate of spaghetti:
- material: 6.1.8 (fixed)
- icons: ^5.15.17 (floating)
- lab: ^5.0.0-alpha.170 (alpha)
- data-grid & date-pickers: 7.22.2 (different major)
Recommend aligning versions for better stability:
-"@mui/material": "6.1.8", -"@mui/icons-material": "^5.15.17", -"@mui/lab": "^5.0.0-alpha.170", +"@mui/material": "^6.1.8", +"@mui/icons-material": "^6.0.0", +"@mui/lab": "^6.0.0",Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/Adornments/index.jsx (1)
22-22: Straight from the underground: Let's be consistent with spacing!You're using a CSS variable
var(--env-var-spacing-1-minus)while other spacing uses theme.spacing. Let's keep it consistent!-paddingRight={"var(--env-var-spacing-1-minus)"} +paddingRight={theme.spacing(1)}Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/index.jsx (2)
24-54: Add PropTypes for Required componentYo dawg! I noticed the Required component is missing its PropTypes definition. Even though it doesn't take props now, it's good practice to define them for consistency and future-proofing.
Add this after the Required component:
+Required.propTypes = {};
75-75: Consider memoizing fieldType state updatesMom's spaghetti! The fieldType state might cause unnecessary rerenders. Consider using useCallback or moving the state up if it's only needed for password toggle.
-const [fieldType, setFieldType] = useState(type); +const [fieldType, setFieldType] = useState(type); +const handleTypeChange = useCallback((newType) => { + setFieldType(newType); +}, []);Client/src/Pages/test.jsx (2)
1-6: Yo dawg, let's optimize these imports!Consider consolidating the adornment imports into a single line since they're from the same location:
-import { HttpAdornment } from "../Components/Inputs/TextInput/Adornments"; -import { PasswordEndAdornment } from "../Components/Inputs/TextInput/Adornments"; +import { HttpAdornment, PasswordEndAdornment } from "../Components/Inputs/TextInput/Adornments";
70-188: The whole test page structure needs some love, yo!Consider organizing the test cases into logical groups using a component composition pattern:
const TestCase = ({ title, description, children }) => ( <Stack spacing={2}> <Typography variant="h6">{title}</Typography> <Typography>{description}</Typography> {children} </Stack> ); // Usage: <TestCase title="Basic Text Input" description="Type anything for an error. Type 'clear' to clear the error." > <Field {...fieldProps} /> <TextInput {...textInputProps} /> </TestCase>This would make the test cases more maintainable and easier to understand.
Client/src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js (3)
234-245: Consolidate duplicate helper text styles, buddy!The helper text styles are duplicated between normal and error states. Let's clean this up:
"& .MuiFormHelperText-root": { color: palette.error.main, opacity: 0.8, fontSize: "var(--env-var-font-size-medium)", marginLeft: 0, -}, -"& .MuiFormHelperText-root.Mui-error": { - opacity: 0.8, - fontSize: "var(--env-var-font-size-medium)", - color: palette.error.main, },
229-233: Extract repeated border radius value to theme, eh!The border radius value of 4 is repeated. Consider using theme's shape property:
"& .MuiOutlinedInput-root": { - borderRadius: 4, + borderRadius: theme.shape.borderRadius, }, "& .MuiOutlinedInput-notchedOutline": { - borderRadius: 4, + borderRadius: theme.shape.borderRadius, },
235-236: Consider using theme's error styling systemInstead of hard-coding the opacity for error states, consider using the theme's error styling system or extract it to a theme variable:
"& .MuiFormHelperText-root": { color: theme.palette.error.main, - opacity: 0.8, + opacity: theme.palette.error.opacity || 0.8,
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Client/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
Client/package.json(1 hunks)Client/src/App.jsx(2 hunks)Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.css(2 hunks)Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.jsx(3 hunks)Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/Adornments/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/test.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.css
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.jsx
[error] 193-193: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
Client/package.json (1)
19-19:
Yo! Major version bump alert! 🍝
The jump from MUI v5 to v6 is like mom's spaghetti - it's heavy! This major version upgrade could introduce breaking changes that might affect your Field component refactoring.
Let's check for potential compatibility issues:
Consider:
- Testing the Field component thoroughly with v6
- Reviewing MUI v6 migration guide
- Aligning other MUI package versions (icons, lab) with v6
Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/Adornments/index.jsx (1)
37-38: Mom's spaghetti approved: Solid accessibility implementation!
The aria-label and onClick handler for password visibility toggle are well implemented, making it accessible for screen readers.
Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/index.jsx (1)
6-22: Consider handling other input types in getSx function
Yo! The getSx function currently only has special styling for URL inputs. Other input types might need their own styling love too!
Let's check what other input types are being used:
Consider adding a switch statement to handle different input types:
const getSx = (theme, type, maxWidth) => {
const sx = {
maxWidth: maxWidth,
};
-
- if (type === "url") {
+ switch(type) {
+ case "url":
return {
...sx,
"& .MuiInputBase-root": { padding: 0 },
"& .MuiStack-root": {
borderTopLeftRadius: theme.shape.borderRadius,
borderBottomLeftRadius: theme.shape.borderRadius,
},
};
+ case "password":
+ return {
+ ...sx,
+ "& .MuiInputBase-root": {
+ paddingRight: 0
+ }
+ };
+ default:
+ return sx;
}
- return sx;
};Client/src/Pages/test.jsx (1)
170-176: Let's verify that CSS variable before we lose ourselves!
The --env-var-width-4 CSS variable is used for maxWidth. Let's ensure it's defined in your theme:
✅ Verification successful
Yo, the CSS variable is legit! We're good to go!
The --env-var-width-4 is properly defined in Client/src/index.css with a value of 100px and is already being used in other components like the Field component. Everything checks out!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the CSS variable definition
rg --type css --type scss "env-var-width-4"
Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search without file type restrictions
rg --type-add 'styles:*.{css,scss,less,sass,style*}' --type styles "env-var-width"
# Also search in any file that might contain CSS-in-JS or styled-components
rg "env-var-width"
# Let's also check for any CSS/style related files
fd -e css -e scss -e less -e sass
Length of output: 2603
Client/src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js (2)
226-226: Verify the padding value's consistency across themes
The padding uses a CSS variable that might need verification across different themes:
✅ Verification successful
CSS variable --env-var-spacing-1-minus is consistently defined and used
The variable is properly defined in Client/src/index.css with a value of 10px and is consistently used across multiple components for padding purposes, including text input adornments, fields, and the global theme. The usage patterns show a coherent padding strategy throughout the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of the padding CSS variable
rg --type css --type js "env-var-spacing-1-minus"
Length of output: 678
223-223: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use theme's color system instead of direct palette reference, eh!
The direct reference to palette.text.secondary should use the theme context instead:
-color: palette.text.secondary, // or any color from your palette
+color: theme.palette.text.secondary,Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.jsx (1)
189-193:
Mom's spaghetti moment: Error handling needs cleanup! 🍝
The current error visibility implementation has some issues:
- The boolean expression can be simplified
- Using className for error visibility creates tight coupling
Apply these changes:
- hidden={className ? true : false}
+ hidden={!!className}Consider introducing a dedicated prop for error visibility control:
errorVisible={props.showError}Let's check for existing error handling patterns:
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 193-193: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
| export const PasswordEndAdornment = ({ fieldType, setFieldType }) => { | ||
| const theme = useTheme(); | ||
| return ( | ||
| <InputAdornment position="end"> | ||
| <IconButton | ||
| aria-label="toggle password visibility" | ||
| onClick={() => setFieldType(fieldType === "password" ? "text" : "password")} | ||
| sx={{ | ||
| color: theme.palette.border.dark, | ||
| padding: theme.spacing(1), | ||
| "&:focus-visible": { | ||
| outline: `2px solid ${theme.palette.primary.main}`, | ||
| outlineOffset: `2px`, | ||
| }, | ||
| "& .MuiTouchRipple-root": { | ||
| pointerEvents: "none", | ||
| display: "none", | ||
| }, | ||
| }} | ||
| > | ||
| {fieldType === "password" ? <VisibilityOff /> : <Visibility />} | ||
| </IconButton> | ||
| </InputAdornment> | ||
| ); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Lose yourself in the PropTypes, the moment, you better never let it go!
The component is missing PropTypes validation for fieldType and setFieldType. Also, since this component might be re-rendered frequently when the password field changes, we should optimize it.
Add PropTypes:
PasswordEndAdornment.propTypes = {
fieldType: PropTypes.oneOf(['password', 'text']).isRequired,
setFieldType: PropTypes.func.isRequired,
};Optimize with memo:
+import { memo } from 'react';
-export const PasswordEndAdornment = ({ fieldType, setFieldType }) => {
+export const PasswordEndAdornment = memo(({ fieldType, setFieldType }) => {
// ... component code ...
-};
+});| @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ | |||
| import { Stack, Typography, InputAdornment, IconButton } from "@mui/material"; | |||
| import { useTheme } from "@mui/material/styles"; | |||
| import { useState } from "react"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo dawg, you've got an unused import there!
The useState import isn't being used in either component. Let's keep our code clean like mom's spaghetti!
-import { useState } from "react";📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import { useState } from "react"; |
| slotProps={{ | ||
| input: { | ||
| startAdornment: startAdornment, | ||
| endAdornment: endAdornment | ||
| ? cloneElement(endAdornment, { fieldType, setFieldType }) | ||
| : null, | ||
| }, | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Risky usage of cloneElement with endAdornment
Knees weak! The cloneElement usage with fieldType and setFieldType is risky as it assumes these props will be accepted by the endAdornment component.
Consider adding prop validation or TypeScript to ensure type safety. For now, add a safety check:
slotProps={{
input: {
startAdornment: startAdornment,
- endAdornment: endAdornment
- ? cloneElement(endAdornment, { fieldType, setFieldType })
- : null,
+ endAdornment: endAdornment && typeof endAdornment.type === 'function'
+ ? cloneElement(endAdornment, {
+ fieldType,
+ setFieldType,
+ ...endAdornment.props
+ })
+ : endAdornment,
},
}}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| slotProps={{ | |
| input: { | |
| startAdornment: startAdornment, | |
| endAdornment: endAdornment | |
| ? cloneElement(endAdornment, { fieldType, setFieldType }) | |
| : null, | |
| }, | |
| }} | |
| slotProps={{ | |
| input: { | |
| startAdornment: startAdornment, | |
| endAdornment: endAdornment && typeof endAdornment.type === 'function' | |
| ? cloneElement(endAdornment, { | |
| fieldType, | |
| setFieldType, | |
| ...endAdornment.props | |
| }) | |
| : endAdornment, | |
| }, | |
| }} |
| TextInput.propTypes = { | ||
| type: PropTypes.string, | ||
| value: PropTypes.string, | ||
| placeholder: PropTypes.string, | ||
| isRequired: PropTypes.bool, | ||
| isOptional: PropTypes.bool, | ||
| optionalLabel: PropTypes.string, | ||
| onChange: PropTypes.func, | ||
| error: PropTypes.bool, | ||
| helperText: PropTypes.string, | ||
| startAdornment: PropTypes.node, | ||
| endAdornment: PropTypes.node, | ||
| label: PropTypes.string, | ||
| maxWidth: PropTypes.string, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Strengthen PropTypes definitions
Arms are heavy! Some prop types could be more specific to prevent invalid usage.
TextInput.propTypes = {
- type: PropTypes.string,
+ type: PropTypes.oneOf(['text', 'password', 'url', 'email', 'number']).isRequired,
value: PropTypes.string,
placeholder: PropTypes.string,
isRequired: PropTypes.bool,
isOptional: PropTypes.bool,
optionalLabel: PropTypes.string,
- onChange: PropTypes.func,
+ onChange: PropTypes.func.isRequired,
error: PropTypes.bool,
helperText: PropTypes.string,
startAdornment: PropTypes.node,
endAdornment: PropTypes.node,
label: PropTypes.string,
- maxWidth: PropTypes.string,
+ maxWidth: PropTypes.oneOfType([PropTypes.string, PropTypes.number]),
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| TextInput.propTypes = { | |
| type: PropTypes.string, | |
| value: PropTypes.string, | |
| placeholder: PropTypes.string, | |
| isRequired: PropTypes.bool, | |
| isOptional: PropTypes.bool, | |
| optionalLabel: PropTypes.string, | |
| onChange: PropTypes.func, | |
| error: PropTypes.bool, | |
| helperText: PropTypes.string, | |
| startAdornment: PropTypes.node, | |
| endAdornment: PropTypes.node, | |
| label: PropTypes.string, | |
| maxWidth: PropTypes.string, | |
| }; | |
| TextInput.propTypes = { | |
| type: PropTypes.oneOf(['text', 'password', 'url', 'email', 'number']).isRequired, | |
| value: PropTypes.string, | |
| placeholder: PropTypes.string, | |
| isRequired: PropTypes.bool, | |
| isOptional: PropTypes.bool, | |
| optionalLabel: PropTypes.string, | |
| onChange: PropTypes.func.isRequired, | |
| error: PropTypes.bool, | |
| helperText: PropTypes.string, | |
| startAdornment: PropTypes.node, | |
| endAdornment: PropTypes.node, | |
| label: PropTypes.string, | |
| maxWidth: PropTypes.oneOfType([PropTypes.string, PropTypes.number]), | |
| }; |
Client/src/Pages/test.jsx
Outdated
| const [originalValue, setOriginalValue] = useState(""); | ||
| const [originalError, setOriginalError] = useState(""); | ||
|
|
||
| const [newValue, setNewValue] = useState(""); | ||
| const [newError, setNewError] = useState(""); | ||
|
|
||
| const [thresholdValue, setThresholdValue] = useState(20); | ||
| const [thresholdError, setThresholdError] = useState(""); | ||
|
|
||
| const [thresholdValue2, setThresholdValue2] = useState(20); | ||
| const [thresholdError2, setThresholdError2] = useState(""); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's clean up this state management!
Consider consolidating these similar state patterns into a custom hook or reducer to reduce code duplication:
// custom hook example
const useInputState = (initialValue = '') => {
const [value, setValue] = useState(initialValue);
const [error, setError] = useState('');
return { value, setValue, error, setError };
};
// usage in component
const { value: originalValue, setValue: setOriginalValue, error: originalError, setError: setOriginalError } = useInputState();
Client/src/Pages/test.jsx
Outdated
| type={"url"} | ||
| id="monitor-url" | ||
| label={"URL to monitor"} | ||
| placeholder={""} | ||
| value={newValue} | ||
| startAdornment={<HttpAdornment https={true} />} | ||
| onChange={handleNewValue} | ||
| error={newError !== ""} | ||
| helperText={newError} | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There's vomit on these duplicate IDs already!
Multiple elements share the same ID ('monitor-url', 'login-password-input'), which violates HTML uniqueness requirements:
-id="monitor-url"
+id="monitor-url-new"
-id="login-password-input"
+id="login-password-input-new"Also applies to: 132-145
Client/src/Pages/test.jsx
Outdated
| const handleThresholdValue = (e) => { | ||
| const parsedVal = parseInt(e.target.value); | ||
| setThresholdError(checkThresholdError(parsedVal)); | ||
| setThresholdValue(parsedVal); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const handleThresholdValue2 = (e) => { | ||
| const parsedVal = parseInt(e.target.value); | ||
| setThresholdError2(checkThresholdError2(parsedVal)); | ||
| setThresholdValue2(parsedVal); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Careful with that parseInt, your arms might get heavy!
The parseInt calls are missing the radix parameter, which could lead to unexpected results:
-const parsedVal = parseInt(e.target.value);
+const parsedVal = parseInt(e.target.value, 10);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const handleThresholdValue = (e) => { | |
| const parsedVal = parseInt(e.target.value); | |
| setThresholdError(checkThresholdError(parsedVal)); | |
| setThresholdValue(parsedVal); | |
| }; | |
| const handleThresholdValue2 = (e) => { | |
| const parsedVal = parseInt(e.target.value); | |
| setThresholdError2(checkThresholdError2(parsedVal)); | |
| setThresholdValue2(parsedVal); | |
| }; | |
| const handleThresholdValue = (e) => { | |
| const parsedVal = parseInt(e.target.value, 10); | |
| setThresholdError(checkThresholdError(parsedVal)); | |
| setThresholdValue(parsedVal); | |
| }; | |
| const handleThresholdValue2 = (e) => { | |
| const parsedVal = parseInt(e.target.value, 10); | |
| setThresholdError2(checkThresholdError2(parsedVal)); | |
| setThresholdValue2(parsedVal); | |
| }; |
| @@ -55,7 +47,6 @@ const Field = forwardRef( | |||
| disabled, | |||
| hidden, | |||
| className, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo dawg, let's talk about that className prop! 🍝
While adding the className prop is good for component flexibility, using it to control error visibility seems like an unexpected side effect. Consider separating these concerns.
Consider these improvements:
- Add a separate prop for error visibility control
- Simplify the className concatenation using template literals
- className={`${className ?? `field field-${type}`}`}
+ className={`field field-${type} ${className ?? ''}`}Also applies to: 228-228
Client/src/App.jsx
Outdated
| <Route | ||
| path="/test" | ||
| element={<Test />} | ||
| /> | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mom's spaghetti moment: Route needs protection! 🍝
The test route is currently exposed without any protection. Unlike other routes that use ProtectedRoute, this one's raw like fresh pasta!
Apply this change to protect the route:
<Route
path="/test"
- element={<Test />}
+ element={
+ process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development'
+ ? <ProtectedRoute Component={Test} />
+ : <Navigate to="/monitors" />
+ }
/>Also, consider moving this route closer to other development-only routes for better organization.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <Route | |
| path="/test" | |
| element={<Test />} | |
| /> | |
| <Route | |
| path="/test" | |
| element={ | |
| process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' | |
| ? <ProtectedRoute Component={Test} /> | |
| : <Navigate to="/monitors" /> | |
| } | |
| /> |
Client/src/App.jsx
Outdated
| @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ import { logger } from "./Utils/Logger"; // Import the logger | |||
| import { networkService } from "./main"; | |||
| import { Infrastructure } from "./Pages/Infrastructure"; | |||
| import InfrastructureDetails from "./Pages/Infrastructure/Details"; | |||
| import Test from "./Pages/test"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Yo, this test route needs some protection sauce! 🍝
Looking at App.jsx, the test route is completely exposed without any ProtectedRoute wrapper, unlike other routes in the app. This is a security concern since it's testing sensitive form components.
- Line 93-97 in App.jsx needs to be wrapped with ProtectedRoute:
- <Route
- path="/test"
- element={<Test />}
- />
+ <Route
+ path="/test"
+ element={<ProtectedRoute Component={Test} />}
+ />🔗 Analysis chain
Yo dawg, we need to protect that test route! 🍝
The Test component import looks good, but considering this is for testing the refactored Field component, we should ensure it's not accessible in production.
Let's check if there are any environment checks:
Consider wrapping this import with an environment check:
- import Test from "./Pages/test";
+ const Test = process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development'
+ ? require('./Pages/test').default
+ : () => null;The previous search didn't work because we need to first locate the test file. Let's check its actual content and the route definition to understand how it's being used and whether there are any existing protections.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for environment-related code in the Test component
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*/test.{jsx,tsx,js,ts}' 'process.env'
Length of output: 212
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the test file location
fd -e jsx -e js -e tsx -e ts "test" ./Client/src/Pages
# Then check its content
fd -e jsx -e js -e tsx -e ts "test" ./Client/src/Pages -x cat {}
# Also check the route definition in App.jsx
cat ./Client/src/App.jsx
Length of output: 12427
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
-
Business value and requirements alignment:
- The PR aims to refactor the
Fieldcomponent to enhance its maintainability and usability. The refactor allows easier management of field width via themaxWidthprop and optional display of error text via thehelperTextprop.
- The PR aims to refactor the
-
Key components modified:
- The
Fieldcomponent and its associated styles have been modified. New components likeTextInputand adornments (HttpAdornmentandPasswordEndAdornment) have been added.
- The
-
Impact assessment:
- The changes impact the
Fieldcomponent and its usage across the application. The addition of theTextInputcomponent and adornments introduces new ways to handle input fields, which may affect existing forms and input handling logic.
- The changes impact the
-
System dependencies and integration impacts:
- The update to
@mui/materialfrom version5.16.7to6.1.8introduces new features and potentially breaking changes. This requires testing to ensure compatibility with the existing codebase.
- The update to
1.2 Architecture Changes
-
System design modifications:
- The introduction of the
TextInputcomponent and adornments represents a shift in how input fields are managed. TheFieldcomponent is now more modular, with separate concerns for different types of inputs and their adornments.
- The introduction of the
-
Component interactions:
- The
TextInputcomponent interacts with adornments likeHttpAdornmentandPasswordEndAdornment, which enhances the functionality of input fields. TheFieldcomponent is now more decoupled from specific input types.
- The
-
Integration points impact:
- The changes affect the integration points where the
Fieldcomponent is used. Developers will need to update their usage to accommodate the new props and components.
- The changes affect the integration points where the
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/index.jsx - TextInput
- Submitted PR Code:
import { Stack, TextField, Typography } from "@mui/material"; import { useTheme } from "@emotion/react"; import { forwardRef, useState, cloneElement } from "react"; import PropTypes from "prop-types"; const getSx = (theme, type, maxWidth) => { const sx = { maxWidth: maxWidth, }; if (type === "url") { return { ...sx, "& .MuiInputBase-root": { padding: 0 }, "& .MuiStack-root": { borderTopLeftRadius: theme.shape.borderRadius, borderBottomLeftRadius: theme.shape.borderRadius, }, }; } return sx; }; const Required = () => { const theme = useTheme(); return ( <Typography component="span" ml={theme.spacing(1)} color={theme.palette.error.main} > * </Typography> ); }; const Optional = ({ optionalLabel }) => { const theme = useTheme(); return ( <Typography component="span" fontSize="inherit" fontWeight={400} ml={theme.spacing(2)} sx={{ opacity: 0.6 }} > {optionalLabel || "(optional)"} </Typography> ); }; Optional.propTypes = { optionalLabel: PropTypes.string, }; const TextInput = forwardRef( ( { type, value, placeholder, isRequired, isOptional, optionalLabel, onChange, error = false, helperText = null, startAdornment = null, endAdornment = null, label = null, maxWidth = "100%", }, ref ) => { const [fieldType, setFieldType] = useState(type); const theme = useTheme(); return ( <Stack> <Typography component="h3" fontSize={"var(--env-var-font-size-medium)"} color={theme.palette.text.secondary} fontWeight={500} > {label} {isRequired && <Required />} {isOptional && <Optional optionalLabel={optionalLabel} />} </Typography> <TextField type={fieldType} value={value} placeholder={placeholder} onChange={onChange} error={error} helperText={helperText} inputRef={ref} sx={getSx(theme, type, maxWidth)} slotProps={{ input: { startAdornment: startAdornment, endAdornment: endAdornment ? cloneElement(endAdornment, { fieldType, setFieldType }) : null, }, }} /> </Stack> ); } ); TextInput.displayName = "TextInput"; TextInput.propTypes = { type: PropTypes.string, value: PropTypes.string, placeholder: PropTypes.string, isRequired: PropTypes.bool, isOptional: PropTypes.bool, optionalLabel: PropTypes.string, onChange: PropTypes.func, error: PropTypes.bool, helperText: PropTypes.string, startAdornment: PropTypes.node, endAdornment: PropTypes.node, label: PropTypes.string, maxWidth: PropTypes.string, }; export default TextInput;
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues:
- The
TextInputcomponent is well-structured and modular, but there are a few potential issues:- The
getSxfunction could be optimized for better readability and performance. - The
RequiredandOptionalcomponents are defined inside theTextInputcomponent, which might make them less reusable. - The
cloneElementusage forendAdornmentcould be simplified for better performance.
- The
- The
- Edge cases and error handling:
- The component handles various edge cases, such as optional and required fields, but it lacks explicit error handling for invalid props.
- The
helperTextprop is used to display error messages, but there is no validation for thehelperTextcontent.
- **Cross-component impact **:
- The
TextInputcomponent interacts with adornments, which affects how input fields are rendered and behaved. - The
Fieldcomponent might need to be updated to integrate with the newTextInputcomponent.
- The
- **Business logic considerations **:
- The component aligns well with the business logic of handling different types of input fields with various adornments.
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const getSx = (theme, type, maxWidth) => ({ maxWidth, ...(type === "url" && { "& .MuiInputBase-root": { padding: 0 }, "& .MuiStack-root": { borderTopLeftRadius: theme.shape.borderRadius, borderBottomLeftRadius: theme.shape.borderRadius, }, }), }); const Required = ({ theme }) => ( <Typography component="span" ml={theme.spacing(1)} color={theme.palette.error.main} > * </Typography> ); const Optional = ({ optionalLabel, theme }) => ( <Typography component="span" fontSize="inherit" fontWeight={400} ml={theme.spacing(2)} sx={{ opacity: 0.6 }} > {optionalLabel || "(optional)"} </Typography> );
- **Improvement rationale **:
- Technical benefits:
- The suggested improvements enhance the readability and performance of the
getSxfunction. - Making
RequiredandOptionalcomponents reusable by passingthemeas a prop.
- The suggested improvements enhance the readability and performance of the
- Business value:
- Improved maintainability and reusability of the components.
- Risk assessment:
- Low risk as the changes are incremental and improve existing functionality.
- Technical benefits:
- Current logic and potential issues:
Client/src/Components/Inputs/TextInput/Adornments/index.jsx - HttpAdornment
- Submitted PR Code:
import { Stack, Typography, InputAdornment, IconButton } from "@mui/material"; import { useTheme } from "@mui/material/styles"; import { useState } from "react"; import PropTypes from "prop-types"; import VisibilityOff from "@mui/icons-material/VisibilityOff"; import Visibility from "@mui/icons-material/Visibility"; export const HttpAdornment = ({ https }) => { const theme = useTheme(); return ( <Stack direction="row" alignItems="center" height="100%" sx={{ borderRight: `solid 1px ${theme.palette.border.dark}`, backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.accent, pl: theme.spacing(6), }} > <Typography component="h5" paddingRight={"var(--env-var-spacing-1-minus)"} color={theme.palette.text.secondary} sx={{ lineHeight: 1, opacity: 0.8 }} > {https ? "https" : "http"}:// </Typography> </Stack> ); }; export const PasswordEndAdornment = ({ fieldType, setFieldType }) => { const theme = useTheme(); return ( <InputAdornment position="end"> <IconButton aria-label="toggle password visibility" onClick={() => setFieldType(fieldType === "password" ? "text" : "password")} sx={{ color: theme.palette.border.dark, padding: theme.spacing(1), "&:focus-visible": { outline: `2px solid ${theme.palette.primary.main}`, outlineOffset: `2px`, }, "& .MuiTouchRipple-root": { pointerEvents: "none", display: "none", }, }} > {fieldType === "password" ? <VisibilityOff /> : <Visibility />} </IconButton> </InputAdornment> ); }; HttpAdornment.propTypes = { https: PropTypes.bool.isRequired, };
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues:
- The
HttpAdornmentandPasswordEndAdornmentcomponents are well-structured and provide necessary functionality for input adornments. - The
HttpAdornmentcomponent could be optimized for better readability and performance. - The
PasswordEndAdornmentcomponent could benefit from better accessibility features.
- The
- Edge cases and error handling:
- The components handle basic edge cases, but there is no explicit error handling for invalid props.
- The
PasswordEndAdornmentcomponent toggles the password visibility, but it lacks error handling for invalidfieldTypevalues.
- **Cross-component impact **:
- The adornments interact with the
TextInputcomponent, affecting how input fields are rendered and behaved. - Other components using these adornments might need to be updated to handle the new props and functionality.
- The adornments interact with the
- **Business logic considerations **:
- The adornments align well with the business logic of handling different types of input fields with various adornments.
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
export const HttpAdornment = ({ https, theme }) => ( <Stack direction="row" alignItems="center" height="100%" sx={{ borderRight: `solid 1px ${theme.palette.border.dark}`, backgroundColor: theme.palette.background.accent, pl: theme.spacing(6), }} > <Typography component="h5" paddingRight={"var(--env-var-spacing-1-minus)"} color={theme.palette.text.secondary} sx={{ lineHeight: 1, opacity: 0.8 }} > {https ? "https" : "http"}:// </Typography> </Stack> ); export const PasswordEndAdornment = ({ fieldType, setFieldType, theme }) => ( <InputAdornment position="end"> <IconButton aria-label="toggle password visibility" onClick={() => setFieldType(fieldType === "password" ? "text" : "password")} sx={{ color: theme.palette.border.dark, padding: theme.spacing(1), "&:focus-visible": { outline: `2px solid ${theme.palette.primary.main}`, outlineOffset: `2px`, }, "& .MuiTouchRipple-root": { pointerEvents: "none", display: "none", }, }} > {fieldType === "password" ? <VisibilityOff /> : <Visibility />} </IconButton> </InputAdornment> );
- **Improvement rationale **:
- Technical benefits:
- The suggested improvements enhance the readability and performance of the
HttpAdornmentcomponent. - Passing
themeas a prop makes the components more reusable and modular. - Improving accessibility features in the
PasswordEndAdornmentcomponent.
- The suggested improvements enhance the readability and performance of the
- Business value:
- Improved maintainability and reusability of the components.
- Risk assessment:
- Low risk as the changes are incremental and improve existing functionality.
- Technical benefits:
- Current logic and potential issues:
Client/src/Utils/Theme/globalTheme.js - MuiTextField
- Submitted PR Code:
MuiTextField: { styleOverrides: { root: ({ theme }) => ({ "& fieldset": { borderColor: theme.palette.border.dark, borderRadius: theme.shape.borderRadius, }, "& .MuiInputBase-input": { height: "var(--env-var-height-2)", fontSize: "var(--env-var-font-size-medium)", fontWeight: 400, color: palette.text.secondary, // or any color from your palette }, "& .MuiInputBase-input.MuiOutlinedInput-input": { padding: "0 var(--env-var-spacing-1-minus) !important", }, "& .MuiOutlinedInput-root": { borderRadius: 4, }, "& .MuiOutlinedInput-notchedOutline": { borderRadius: 4, }, "& .MuiFormHelperText-root": { color: palette.error.main, opacity: 0.8, fontSize: "var(--env-var-font-size-medium)", marginLeft: 0, }, "& .MuiFormHelperText-root.Mui-error": { opacity: 0.8, fontSize: "var(--env-var-font-size-medium)", color: palette.error.main, }, }), }, },
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues:
- The
MuiTextFieldstyle overrides are well-defined and provide a consistent look and feel for text fields. - The use of
!importantin the padding style can lead to maintainability issues and should be avoided. - The opacity and font size settings for
MuiFormHelperText-rootandMuiFormHelperText-root.Mui-errorcan be simplified for better readability.
- The
- Edge cases and error handling:
- The style overrides handle basic edge cases, but there is no explicit error handling for invalid theme values.
- The use of
!importantcan override other styles unintentionally, leading to unexpected behavior.
- **Cross-component impact **:
- The style overrides affect all
TextFieldcomponents in the application, ensuring a consistent design. - Other components using
TextFieldmight need to be updated to handle the new styles.
- The style overrides affect all
- **Business logic considerations **:
- The style overrides align well with the business logic of providing a consistent and visually appealing design for text fields.
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
MuiTextField: { styleOverrides: { root: ({ theme }) => ({ "& fieldset": { borderColor: theme.palette.border.dark, borderRadius: theme.shape.borderRadius, }, "& .MuiInputBase-input": { height: "var(--env-var-height-2)", fontSize: "var(--env-var-font-size-medium)", fontWeight: 400, color: palette.text.secondary, }, "& .MuiInputBase-input.MuiOutlinedInput-input": { padding: "0 var(--env-var-spacing-1-minus)", }, "& .MuiOutlinedInput-root, & .MuiOutlinedInput-notchedOutline": { borderRadius: 4, }, "& .MuiFormHelperText-root": { color: palette.error.main, opacity: 0.8, fontSize: "var(--env-var-font-size-medium)", marginLeft: 0, }, }), }, },
- **Improvement rationale **:
- Technical benefits:
- The suggested improvements enhance the readability and maintainability of the style overrides.
- Avoiding the use of
!importantensures that styles are applied consistently and predictably.
- Business value:
- Improved maintainability and consistency of the design.
- Risk assessment:
- Low risk as the changes are incremental and improve existing functionality.
- Technical benefits:
- Current logic and potential issues:
Client/src/Pages/test.jsx - Test
- Submitted PR Code:
import { Stack, Typography } from "@mui/material"; import Field from "../Components/Inputs/Field"; import TextInput from "../Components/Inputs/TextInput"; import { useState, useEffect, useRef } from "react"; import { HttpAdornment } from "../Components/Inputs/TextInput/Adornments"; import { PasswordEndAdornment } from "../Components/Inputs/TextInput/Adornments"; const Test = () => { const [originalValue, setOriginalValue] = useState(""); const [originalError, setOriginalError] = useState(""); const [newValue, setNewValue] = useState(""); const [newError, setNewError] = useState(""); const [thresholdValue, setThresholdValue] = useState(20); const [thresholdError, setThresholdError] = useState(""); const [thresholdValue2, setThresholdValue2] = useState(20); const [thresholdError2, setThresholdError2] = useState(""); const inputRef = useRef(null); useEffect(() => { if (inputRef.current) { inputRef.current.focus(); } }, []); const checkError = (value) => { if (value !== "clear") { return "This is an error"; } return ""; }; const checkThresholdError = (value) => { if (value !== 99) { return "This is a threshold error"; } return ""; }; const checkThresholdError2 = (value) => { if (value !== 99) { return "This is a threshold error 2"; } return ""; }; const handleOriginalValue = (e) => { setOriginalError(checkError(e.target.value)); setOriginalValue(e.target.value); }; const handleNewValue = (e) => { setNewError(checkError(e.target.value)); setNewValue(e.target.value); }; const handleThresholdValue = (e) => { const parsedVal = parseInt(e.target.value); setThresholdError(checkThresholdError(parsedVal)); setThresholdValue(parsedVal); }; const handleThresholdValue2 = (e) => { const parsedVal = parseInt(e.target.value); setThresholdError2(checkThresholdError2(parsedVal)); setThresholdValue2(parsedVal); }; return ( <Stack gap={8} direction="column" border="1px dashed blue" padding="1rem" > <Typography> This is a test page for the TextInput component. It is a rationalized Input component. </Typography> <Typography>Type anything for an error.</Typography> <Typography>Typing "clear" will clear the error for text based input</Typography> <Typography>Typing "99" will clear the error for threshold based input</Typography> <Field id="original-field" onChange={handleOriginalValue} type="text" value={originalValue} error={originalError} /> <TextInput value={newValue} onChange={handleNewValue} error={newError !== ""} helperText={newError} /> <Field type={"url"} id="monitor-url" label={"URL to monitor"} https={true} placeholder={""} value={originalValue} onChange={handleOriginalValue} error={originalError} /> <TextInput type={"url"} id="monitor-url" label={"URL to monitor"} placeholder={""} value={newValue} startAdornment={<HttpAdornment https={true} />} onChange={handleNewValue} error={newError !== ""} helperText={newError} /> <Field type="password" id="login-password-input" label="Password" isRequired={true} placeholder="••••••••••" autoComplete="current-password" value={originalValue} onChange={handleOriginalValue} error={originalError} ref={inputRef} /> <TextInput type="password" id="login-password-input" label="Password" isRequired={true} placeholder="••••••••••" autoComplete="current-password" value={newValue} endAdornment={<PasswordEndAdornment />} onChange={handleNewValue} error={newError !== ""} helperText={newError} ref={inputRef} /> <Field id="ttl" label="The days you want to keep monitoring history." isOptional={true} optionalLabel="0 for infinite" value={originalValue} onChange={handleOriginalValue} error={originalError} /> <TextInput id="ttl" label="The days you want to keep monitoring history." isOptional={true} optionalLabel="0 for infinite" value={newValue} onChange={handleNewValue} error={newError !== ""} helperText={newError} /> <Typography>Short field for threshold. Easily show/hide error text</Typography> <TextInput maxWidth="var(--env-var-width-4)" id="threshold" type="number" value={thresholdValue.toString()} onChange={handleThresholdValue} error={thresholdError !== ""} /> <TextInput maxWidth="var(--env-var-width-4)" id="threshold" type="number" value={thresholdValue2.toString()} onChange={handleThresholdValue2} error={thresholdError2 !== ""} /> <Typography sx={{ color: "red" }}> {thresholdError} {thresholdError2} </Typography> </Stack> ); }; export default Test;
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues:
- The
Testcomponent is well-structured and provides a comprehensive test page for theTextInputcomponent. - The component handles various edge cases, such as required and optional fields, and displays error messages.
- The use of
useReffor focusing the input field is a good practice, but it could be optimized for better performance. - The error checking functions (
checkError,checkThresholdError,checkThresholdError2) are duplicated and can be consolidated.
- The
- Edge cases and error handling:
- The component handles basic edge cases, but there is no explicit error handling for invalid props or unexpected behavior.
- The error checking functions are specific to the test cases and might not cover all possible scenarios.
- **Cross-component impact **:
- Current logic and potential issues:
The
Fieldcomponent was a mess and causing headaches for everyone.This PR rewrites the component in a much more rational way. You can easily manage the width of the field by using the
maxWidthprop. More sizing props can be added as needed.If you don't want to show the error text simply omit the "helperText` prop.
Please see
<root>/testURL for a test page.I have tried to replicate the original
Fieldcomponent as closely as possible, please let me know if there is anything I've missed.This was a very trying tasks as there were several methods of styling applied to this component as well as the theme.
Appreciate everyone's reviews!