Fix/fe/field refactor #1173
Fix/fe/field refactor #1173
Conversation
…lasses, add hideErrorText prop to hide errors for thresholds
…t min-width rather than turning off class entirely
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.css (1)
Line range hint
1-7: Yo, we should document these CSS variables!The code uses CSS variables like
--env-var-width-3and--env-var-width-4but their values aren't immediately clear. Consider adding a comment block explaining these variables or linking to documentation.Here's a suggested addition at the top of the file:
+/* Field component width variables: + * --env-var-width-3: Default minimum width for fields + * --env-var-width-4: Maximum width for infrastructure alert fields + */ .field { min-width: var(--env-var-width-3); }Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/CustomThreshold/index.jsx (1)
Line range hint
1-92: Yo dawg, I heard you like refactoring! 🛠️While these changes align with the immediate goals, I noticed from the PR objectives that a larger refactor is planned. Consider these points for the future refactor:
- The component's width is currently hardcoded to 50% - this might need to be more flexible
- The Stack and Box component nesting could potentially be simplified
- The error handling could be more standardized across all form components
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track these suggestions for the future refactor?
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.jsx (4)
10-34: Yo dawg, let's keep the param order consistent with PropTypes!The documentation is solid, but the parameter order in JSDoc doesn't match the PropTypes declaration at the bottom of the file. Consider reordering them to maintain consistency and make it easier for developers to reference.
69-69: Consider using classnames library for more robust class handlingWhile the template literal works, using a dedicated class name utility like
classnamesorclsxwould provide more robust handling of conditional classes and prevent potential issues with undefined className props.Example usage:
-className={`${className} field field-${type}`} +import classnames from 'classnames'; +className={classnames('field', `field-${type}`, className)}
198-202: Mom's spaghetti suggests a performance tweak! 🍝Instead of using the HTML
hiddenattribute which still renders the DOM element, consider using conditional rendering for better performance.-{error && ( +{error && !hideErrorText && ( <Typography component="span" className="input-error" - hidden={hideErrorText} color={theme.palette.error.main} mt={theme.spacing(2)} sx={{ opacity: 0.8, }} > {error} </Typography> )}
237-238: Knees weak, arms heavy, but these PropTypes are ready! 💪While the PropTypes are correctly defined, consider adding
defaultPropsfor better documentation and type checking:Field.defaultProps = { type: 'text', https: true, isRequired: false, isOptional: false, optionalLabel: '(optional)', disabled: false, hidden: false, hideErrorText: false, };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.css(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.jsx(5 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/CustomThreshold/index.jsx(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.css (1)
6-6: Yo dawg, this change looks solid but let's verify the layout impact!
Setting min-width to 0 could affect how the field behaves in different containers. While this change aligns with the PR objectives, we should ensure it doesn't cause unexpected layout shifts.
✅ Verification successful
Yo, this layout change is straight fire! 🔥
The min-width: 0 override is specifically used in the infrastructure alert field within a flex container (justifyContent: "flex-end"), which is exactly where you'd want this behaviour to prevent field expansion. The change is:
- Scoped only to .field-infrastructure-alert class
- Used in a specific context in CustomThreshold component
- Maintains other important styles like max-width and height constraints
- Doesn't affect the base .field class which keeps its original min-width
No layout issues here, just straight-up proper CSS handling, eh!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any responsive layout tests or related components
# Look for related test files
fd -e test.jsx -e test.js -e spec.jsx -e spec.js | grep -i "field\|layout\|responsive"
# Search for related component usage
rg -l "field-infrastructure-alert"
Length of output: 240
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage context of field-infrastructure-alert
rg -A 5 -B 5 "field-infrastructure-alert" Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/CustomThreshold/index.jsx
# Also check if there are any layout-related styles or components that might be affected
rg -l "min-width" Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/
# Let's see the full Field component CSS to understand the context better
cat Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.css
Length of output: 1785
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/CustomThreshold/index.jsx (3)
Line range hint 8-22: Yo, these docs are straight fire! 🔥
The JSDoc formatting improvements make the documentation cleaner while maintaining all the essential information about the component's props and purpose.
26-35: These props be looking clean now! 👌
The consistent formatting and alignment of destructured props makes the code more readable. Nice cleanup!
60-70: Hold up, we need to verify something here! 🤔
The Field component changes look good with the addition of hideErrorText, but let's verify the CSS implementation:
Also, according to the PR objectives, class names should be additive rather than replacing defaults. Let's verify this behavior:
✅ Verification successful
The previous ast-grep pattern didn't work well. Let's try a more specific pattern:
Yo, the CSS implementation is on point! 🎯
Based on the CSS file inspection, the field-infrastructure-alert class is properly implemented with:
- Correct
min-width: 0style - Additional styles for height and Material-UI components
- Doesn't override the base
.fieldclass styles, but adds to them
The class follows the additive pattern since the base .field class remains intact with its own styles, and field-infrastructure-alert adds specific customizations on top.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for field-infrastructure-alert class definition
rg "field-infrastructure-alert" --type css
Length of output: 222
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Field component implementation to verify class handling
ast-grep --pattern 'className={$_}'
Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Field component implementation to see how className is handled
rg -A 5 -B 5 "className.*field-infrastructure-alert" --type jsx
# Also check the CSS file content to verify the styles
cat Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.css
Length of output: 1400
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Field component implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'const Field = ({ className, $$$}) => {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try finding the Field component with ripgrep instead
rg -A 10 "const Field = \(" --type ts --type tsx --type jsx --type js
# Also check if there are any other files using this component to understand class handling
rg "import.*Field" --type ts --type tsx --type jsx --type js
Length of output: 190
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.jsx (1)
57-58: These props are straight fire! 🔥
The new props align perfectly with the PR objectives. Setting hideErrorText default to false maintains backward compatibility while allowing explicit control over error message visibility.
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
-
Business value and requirements alignment:
- The PR aims to refactor the
Fieldcomponent to address concerns around the handling of class names and error messages. - Enhances maintainability and clarity, reducing potential confusion for developers.
- Aligns with best practices by introducing explicit controls for error visibility and styling.
- The PR aims to refactor the
-
Key components modified:
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.jsxClient/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.cssClient/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/CustomThreshold/index.jsx
-
Impact assessment:
- Improves error handling and styling customization.
- Enhances developer experience by making component behavior more explicit.
- Impacts the
CustomThresholdcomponent, which uses theFieldcomponent.
-
System dependencies and integration impacts:
- No significant changes to system design.
- Changes are localized to the
Fieldcomponent and its usage in theCustomThresholdcomponent.
1.2 Architecture Changes
-
System design modifications:
- No significant changes to the system design.
-
Component interactions:
- The
Fieldcomponent now has an additional prophideErrorText, which affects how error messages are displayed.
- The
-
Integration points:
- Changes are localized to the
Fieldcomponent and its usage in theCustomThresholdcomponent.
- Changes are localized to the
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.jsx
-
Submitted PR Code:
const Field = forwardRef( ( { type = "text", id, name, label, https, optionalLabel, autoComplete, placeholder, value, onChange, onBlur, onInput, error, disabled, hidden, className, hideErrorText = false, }, ref ) => { const theme = useTheme(); const [isVisible, setVisible] = useState(false); return ( <Stack gap={theme.spacing(2)} className={`${className} field field-${type}`} sx={{ "& fieldset": { borderColor: theme.palette.border.dark, borderRadius: theme.shape.borderRadius, }, "&:not(:has(.Mui-disabled)):not(:has(.input-error)) .MuiOutlinedInput-root:hover:not(:has(input:focus)):not(:has(textarea:focus)) fieldset": { borderColor: theme.palette.border.dark, }, "&:has(.input-error) .MuiOutlinedInput-root fieldset": { borderColor: theme.palette.error.main, }, }} > {/* Other code */} <Typography component="span" className="input-error" hidden={hideErrorText} color={theme.palette.error.main} mt={theme.spacing(2)} sx={{ opacity: 0.8, }} > {error} </Typography> </Stack> ); } );
-
Analysis:
- The code introduces a new prop
hideErrorTextto control the visibility of error messages. - The
classNameprop is now concatenated with existing class names instead of disabling all default classes. - The
Typographycomponent for error messages now uses thehideErrorTextprop to control visibility.
- The code introduces a new prop
-
LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const Field = forwardRef( ( { type = "text", id, name, label, https, optionalLabel, autoComplete, placeholder, value, onChange, onBlur, onInput, error, disabled, hidden, className, hideErrorText = false, }, ref ) => { const theme = useTheme(); const [isVisible, setVisible] = useState(false); return ( <Stack gap={theme.spacing(2)} className={`field field-${type} ${className}`} sx={{ "& fieldset": { borderColor: theme.palette.border.dark, borderRadius: theme.shape.borderRadius, }, "&:not(:has(.Mui-disabled)):not(:has(.input-error)) .MuiOutlinedInput-root:hover:not(:has(input:focus)):not(:has(textarea:focus)) fieldset": { borderColor: theme.palette.border.dark, }, "&:has(.input-error) .MuiOutlinedInput-root fieldset": { borderColor: theme.palette.error.main, }, }} > {/* Other code */} {error && ( <Typography component="span" className="input-error" hidden={hideErrorText} color={theme.palette.error.main} mt={theme.spacing(2)} sx={{ opacity: 0.8, }} > {error} </Typography> )} </Stack> ); } );
-
Improvement Rationale:
- Ensures that the
classNameprop is correctly concatenated with existing class names. - Maintains the
errorcheck to conditionally render the error message. - Improves readability and maintainability.
- Ensures that the
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.css
-
Submitted PR Code:
.field-infrastructure-alert { min-width: 0; max-width: var(--env-var-width-4); }
-
Analysis:
- Overrides the default
min-widthfor infrastructure alert fields to improve flexibility.
- Overrides the default
-
LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
.field-infrastructure-alert { min-width: 0; max-width: var(--env-var-width-4); }
-
Improvement Rationale:
- No changes needed; the override is necessary for the intended functionality.
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/CreateMonitor/CustomThreshold/index.jsx
-
Submitted PR Code:
<Field type="number" className="field-infrastructure-alert" id={fieldId} value={infrastructureMonitor[fieldId]} onBlur={onFieldBlur} onChange={onFieldChange} error={errors[fieldId]} disabled={!infrastructureMonitor[checkboxId]} hideErrorText={true} ></Field>
-
Analysis:
- Uses the new
hideErrorTextprop to hide error messages for theFieldcomponent.
- Uses the new
-
LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
<Field type="number" className="field-infrastructure-alert" id={fieldId} value={infrastructureMonitor[fieldId]} onBlur={onFieldBlur} onChange={onFieldChange} error={errors[fieldId]} disabled={!infrastructureMonitor[checkboxId]} hideErrorText={true} ></Field>
-
Improvement Rationale:
- No changes needed; the usage of the
hideErrorTextprop is correct and aligns with the intended functionality.
- No changes needed; the usage of the
2.2 Implementation Quality
-
Code organization and structure:
- The code is well-organized, with clear separation of concerns.
- The
Fieldcomponent is modular and reusable.
-
Error handling approach:
- Error messages are now explicitly controlled using the
hideErrorTextprop. - Improves clarity and reduces potential confusion.
- Error messages are now explicitly controlled using the
-
Performance considerations:
- The changes are relatively minor and should not impact performance significantly.
- The use of conditional rendering for error messages ensures that unnecessary elements are not rendered.
3. Critical Findings
3.1 Potential Issues
-
Critical Issues:
- None identified.
-
Warnings:
- None identified.
3.2 Code Quality Concerns
- Maintainability aspects:
- Ensure that the updated JSdocs accurately reflect the changes made to the
Fieldcomponent. - Consider adding examples of how to use the new
hideErrorTextprop.
- Ensure that the updated JSdocs accurately reflect the changes made to the
4. Security Assessment
4.1 Security Considerations
-
Authentication/Authorization impacts:
- No significant changes to authentication or authorization mechanisms.
-
Data handling concerns:
- No new data handling concerns introduced.
-
Input validation:
- No changes affecting input validation.
-
Security best practices:
- The changes adhere to security best practices.
4.2 Vulnerability Analysis
-
Potential security risks:
- None identified.
-
Mitigation strategies:
- No additional mitigation strategies required.
-
Security testing requirements:
- Ensure that existing security tests cover the modified components.
5. Testing Strategy
5.1 Test Coverage
-
Unit test analysis:
- Update unit tests to cover the new
hideErrorTextprop. - Ensure that all edge cases related to the new prop are covered.
- Update unit tests to cover the new
-
Integration test requirements:
- Ensure that the
Fieldcomponent behaves as expected in theCustomThresholdcomponent. - Cover scenarios where error messages are hidden or displayed based on the
hideErrorTextprop.
- Ensure that the
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
// Example unit test for hideErrorText prop
it('should hide error message when hideErrorText is true', () => {
const { getByText } = render(
<Field error="Error message" hideErrorText={true} />
);
expect(getByText('Error message')).toHaveAttribute('hidden');
});
it('should display error message when hideErrorText is false', () => {
const { getByText } = render(
<Field error="Error message" hideErrorText={false} />
);
expect(getByText('Error message')).not.toHaveAttribute('hidden');
});-
Coverage improvements:
- Ensure that the test coverage includes edge cases related to the new prop.
-
Performance testing needs:
- No significant performance testing needs identified.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
-
Documentation updates needed (API, architecture, configuration):
- Update JSdocs to accurately reflect the changes made to the
Fieldcomponent. - Add examples of how to use the new
hideErrorTextprop.
- Update JSdocs to accurately reflect the changes made to the
-
Long-term maintenance considerations:
- The refactoring reduces technical debt and improves the component's maintainability.
- Ensure that any future changes to the
Fieldcomponent are well-documented and tested.
-
Technical debt and monitoring requirements:
- Continuously monitor the usage of the
Fieldcomponent to identify any potential issues. - Address any technical debt related to the
Fieldcomponent in future iterations.
- Continuously monitor the usage of the
7. Summary & Recommendations
7.1 Key Action Items
-
Critical changes required:
- None identified.
-
Important improvements suggested:
- None identified.
-
Best practices to implement:
- Ensure that the updated JSdocs accurately reflect the changes made to the
Fieldcomponent. - Consider adding examples of how to use the new
hideErrorTextprop.
- Ensure that the updated JSdocs accurately reflect the changes made to the
-
Cross-cutting concerns to address:
- Ensure that the
Fieldcomponent behaves as expected in theCustomThresholdcomponent. - Update unit tests to cover the new
hideErrorTextprop.
- Ensure that the
7.2 Future Considerations
-
Technical evolution path:
- Continuously monitor the usage of the
Fieldcomponent to identify any potential issues. - Address any technical debt related to the
Fieldcomponent in future iterations.
- Continuously monitor the usage of the
-
Business capability evolution:
- The refactoring aligns with the business requirements and improves the user experience for developers.
-
System integration impacts:
- Ensure that any future changes to the
Fieldcomponent are well-documented and tested.
- Ensure that any future changes to the
💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it would be good to have field-infrastructure-alert inherit everything from field like below in index.css file:
.field .field-infrastructure-alert {
min-width: unset;
max-width: var(--env-var-width-4);
}
then in index.jsx , change to className={field field-${type} ${className}}
so that only override in case of infrastructure monitoring when className has the value, but still have all the css the .field possess
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jennifer-gan it already inerits everyting from the index.css file, adding the .field selector only increases the specificity 🤔 That's not a bad thing here but I don't think it adds anything.
Or were you referring to setting min-width to unset vs 0? Setting it to unset is probably a better idea, will update.
I'll update the order of classnames as suggested above though, that's a good point 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.jsx (3)
10-34: Yo dawg, these docs are fire but they're missing some examples! 🔥The documentation is comprehensive, but adding usage examples would help developers understand the component better, especially with the new
hideErrorTextprop and class name behaviour.Add examples like:
// Basic usage <Field type="text" id="username" value={username} onChange={handleChange} /> // With error handling <Field type="email" id="email" value={email} error="Invalid email" hideErrorText={false} className="custom-field" />
237-238: Let's make these props default like mom's spaghetti! 🍝While the PropTypes are correctly defined, consider adding defaultProps for better maintainability and documentation.
Add this after the PropTypes definition:
Field.defaultProps = { type: 'text', https: true, isRequired: false, isOptional: false, optionalLabel: '(optional)', disabled: false, hidden: false, hideErrorText: false, className: '', };
Line range hint
1-241: Let's plan that future refactor! 🎯Since this is a temporary solution, here are some suggestions for the comprehensive refactor:
- Consider using a CSS-in-JS solution to eliminate multiple CSS files
- Implement a design system with consistent input field variants
- Use CSS custom properties for theming instead of direct values
- Consider splitting into smaller components (e.g., separate password field)
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track these refactoring tasks?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.css(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.jsx(5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.css
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Client/src/Components/Inputs/Field/index.jsx (1)
69-69: Straight fire className implementation! 🎯
The new className concatenation ensures default styles are preserved while allowing custom overrides. This aligns perfectly with the PR objectives.
| {error && ( | ||
| <Typography | ||
| component="span" | ||
| className="input-error" | ||
| hidden={className? true: false} | ||
| hidden={hideErrorText} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo, we need to fix this accessibility issue! 🚨
Using the HTML hidden attribute for error text isn't ideal for screen readers. Consider using CSS display: none or aria-hidden with proper ARIA attributes.
Here's a suggested fix:
{error && (
<Typography
component="span"
className="input-error"
- hidden={hideErrorText}
+ sx={{
+ display: hideErrorText ? 'none' : 'block',
+ opacity: 0.8,
+ }}
color={theme.palette.error.main}
mt={theme.spacing(2)}
- sx={{
- opacity: 0.8,
- }}
>
{error}
</Typography>
)}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
|
I'm going to merge this as it is essentially identical to @jennifer-gan 's previous PR fixing this issue which I've already merged. The only addition here is a prop to hide the error text. This will be refactored soon with the Field refactor anyways. |
This PR addresses a concern @marcelluscaio and I noticed in the Create Infrastrucutre Monitors page.
The original implementation used the presence or abscence of a class name in the props of the
Fieldcomponent to enable or disable the default classes for the component.The original implementaiton also used the presence or absecnce of a class name to disable showing errors for the
Field.I feel that this is dangerous and will lead to confusion if other devs want to specify class names for the
Fieldcomponent. It is not obvious that specifying a class name will disable the default styling for the component. Nor is it obvious that adding a class name will disable errors from showing.I have modified the implementaitont to achieve the inteded results in a way that is explicit and obvious, which should reduce confusion and unintended outcomes.
hideErrorTextprop to specify that errors should be hiddenThis is a bandaid, and we should make refactoring the
Fieldcomponent a fairly high priority. It is not up to standard and there are multiple CSS files in the app modifying the component which is a nightmare for maintainability.I will open an issue and work on this as soon as possible.