Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for socket asynchronous api for recv & recvfrom #1390

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: feature/distributed-erlang
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pguyot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pguyot pguyot commented Dec 7, 2024

These changes are made under both the "Apache 2.0" and the "GNU Lesser General
Public License 2.1 or later" license terms (dual license).

SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 OR LGPL-2.1-or-later

@pguyot pguyot force-pushed the w49/add-support-for-socket-asynchronous-api branch 7 times, most recently from 5d52096 to 9c3c068 Compare December 8, 2024 09:36
@pguyot pguyot changed the base branch from main to feature/distributed-erlang December 8, 2024 09:37
@pguyot pguyot force-pushed the w49/add-support-for-socket-asynchronous-api branch 14 times, most recently from faa20ff to 6ade2e2 Compare December 14, 2024 13:14
Also add partial support for external pids.

Signed-off-by: Paul Guyot <[email protected]>
Also add partial support for external refs.
Also fix list representation of local refs as a ref with two words,
matching external term encoding.

Signed-off-by: Paul Guyot <[email protected]>
Also add bif erlang:is_port/1 which is called by code compiled with OTP-21
Later versions of the compiler use is_port opcode instead.

Signed-off-by: Paul Guyot <[email protected]>
@pguyot pguyot force-pushed the w49/add-support-for-socket-asynchronous-api branch from 6ade2e2 to 3957e08 Compare December 14, 2024 13:50
Also improve socket stability.

Signed-off-by: Paul Guyot <[email protected]>
@pguyot pguyot force-pushed the w49/add-support-for-socket-asynchronous-api branch from 3957e08 to 6c02e94 Compare December 14, 2024 20:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant